Overall another great article that gives some interesting insights into the business we love to criticize.
It's hard to say if the parks are on the right track. I think the article did a good job at getting across the current state of the company, and that changes should be taking place in the coming years.
I think they got the sleeper park in CW. When Paramount owned them they knew that they didn't really have competition, but they didn't really exploit that. Cedar Fair is going to exploit it. Look at what they are adding this year.
That is a good article. You don't see too many like that in a local newspaper. I think Cedar Fair is going to be in fine shape.
I have to hand it to CF: they're at least making an effort to see those coasters off to safe havens. Although perhaps I shouldn't be so laudatory -- they're a business, after all, and emotion and nostalgia don't enter into their decisions. It must just be that they think they can get more for the woodies by selling them than by paying to have them scrapped. Okay, I take it back.
I noted that the article was accompanied by a photo of the old waterpark at Geauga Lake, not Wildwater Kingdom. Kind of ironic.
My author website: mgrantroberts.com
Glitch01 said:
I think they should just demolish them ASAP so we can all get over it, "this too shall pass".
LOL, good one. Real knee slapper there. *** Edited 11/11/2007 11:26:25 PM UTC by matt.***
2022 Trips: WDW, Sea World San Diego & Orlando, CP, KI, BGW, Bay Beach, Canobie Lake, Universal Orlando
It just seems so costly and unnecessary to try and move them anywhere. *** Edited 11/12/2007 3:29:21 AM UTC by Glitch01***
Beast is decent at night. SOB just flat out sucks.
My favorite MJ tune: "Billie Jean" which I have been listening to alot now. RIP MJ.
And for the record, the Beast rocks at night, especially when its during the Haunt, a chill is in the air and you are in the first row :).
2022 Trips: WDW, Sea World San Diego & Orlando, CP, KI, BGW, Bay Beach, Canobie Lake, Universal Orlando
Uh DUH! but they don't consider 10 dollar parking fees, 4 dollar drinks part of the hassle.
I DO! POP should be POP not POP plus, plus, plus.
Chuck, glad he finally GETS it but I also thought investments were going to go based on each parks revinue numbers not a cap company plan. Something like 20 percent from each park is going back into the park.
Dick said:
“I think a lot of it has been the economy, but certainly there’s the advent of PlayStation and things like that,” he said.
Yeah, that's new competition for amusement parks because video games have only been around a few years. Maybe those newfangled home computers will catch on and become a threat too.
They should have waited until the GL coasters were being torn down before going with the article. That way they could have positioned Mr. Coaster Fan against a background of Big Dipper being crushed into splinters.
*** Edited 11/12/2007 2:16:43 PM UTC by Rob Ascough***
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
Maybe he thinks television will come to pass?
*** Edited 11/12/2007 2:47:03 PM UTC by Rob Ascough***
People do wanna travel, have fun, spend money. At what point does that come to being more hassle than it's worth? What price? What wait times?
He does get some things like making resorts at his properties to boost attendance and even maintain it through hard times. In fact thats the biggest increase in THE BOTTOM LINE over any CONCESSION or PRICE HIKE.
Chuck
All that's happeneing in the case of these big regional parks is that attendance plateau I mention all the time.
Everyone keeps thinking you have to keep bringing more and more people throught the gate. Attendance is no longer the measure of success - especially for parks that have 'matured' in their markets. The easy attendance growth is over. It's time to find new ways to be profitable beyond just trying to lure more people through the gate.
The Toronto park was a huge surprise of the Paramount purchase in that it has few competitors, and nearly 70 percent of Canada’s population lives in Ontario.
And they still can't break 4 million. In comparison, it's downright amazing that parks like continue CP and SF parks do around 3 million (give or take) every year.
Chuck:
People do wanna travel, have fun, spend money. At what point does that come to being more hassle than it's worth? What price? What wait times?
I think you're putting your own personal spin on what the article says.
I don't think that going to the park itself is the hassle, but when compared to other, more easily accessible forms of entertainment, it is a hassle to load up the car and head out - that's the point.
And it's something the good folks at CoasterBuzz have been saying for ages now - the paks are competing with all kinds of entertainment options, not just other parks.
In summary, it's time to quit looking at attendance numbers as the main indicator of success and time to start thinking in non-traditional ways to compete with other forms of entertainment that are more attractive and more easily accessible to people.
You must be logged in to post