To see Shockwave at SFGAm run like Tornado would be a dream come true (I can ride it in my mind and it's just beautiful!). Makes me wonder why they made some layouts they way they did. Widening of a curve here or there would have made a world of difference. They seem to go from one segment to another too abruptly. 500 more feet of track is worth it if it makes the coaster re-ridable for years. After all, Shockwave wasn't constricted by its surroundings if you know what I mean (
grumble*parking lot bad place for ride*grumble)!!!
Sure Arrow has been out of the spotlight for awhile. But part of being successful is building upon your trials and errors and paying attention to other companies and their approaches (which I'm sure they all do). And I have seen Arrow come a long way....after all, how long have they been around? Quite awhile! I really think they can give us more "Tornados", but maybe it's a matter of parks "wanting" them. They are also among the lesser expensive builders. I would love to see their approach to the inverteds.......most notably the ArrowBatic that I haven't heard anything on lately. I'm sure it won't hold a candle to a B&M, but then again it's a MAD MOUSE!!
As for the barrel roll, a forum a couple weeks ago touched on that idea, and how Arrow developed their own a decade ago. It had everything necessary to work, I even saw the prototype test in a documentary. But there were some "demolished bridges" in their railroad of progress, and it got set aside.
BTW, how is that glorious inverted model coming along?? I am moving soon so all "construction" on mine is on hold!
-------------
www.angelfire.com/oh4/tk173 An unnerving stillness in the woods of southern Indiana beckons for you on May 11th.....