Neuski said:
Some feedback on what? This topic brings up nothing new or even worth discussing.
But it's ok to have 25 pages on the thread speculating on Cedar Points next ride?
Good to see I'm back on track in terms of agreeing with DWeaver, although Dante also worded it very well...the PARK may get judged based on operations (and later on, maintenance)...but the RIDE, that gets judged based on the RIDE...
I will ride Toro sometime this year...my sister in NJ has a SFGAdv season pass that needs to get used.. ;)
SixFlagsKingdaKa said:
But it's ok to have 25 pages on the thread speculating on Cedar Points next ride?
I don't think any of the people running the site have a problem with it. The weekly picture updates over on pointbuzz may actually indicate quite the opposite... *** Edited 6/21/2006 7:54:21 PM UTC by matt.***
For instance, on my first trip to IoA I waited 90 minutes in the hot sun through a break down for Spidey. I rode it and thought it was pretty meh. Second time, I got on in about 15 minutes on a nice day. Thought it was the second coming of Jesus. I can't imagine that the effects or the ride itself actually changed much, but the way the park was going in general really influenced my opinion of the ride.
Another example, I was at oG this weekend for Goliath. I could tell that the air was better than Nitro's and the ride was generally better (except the first drop which really didn't do anything), but I was riding by myself and the operations were really not that good (often stacking the second train). It was hot, I was blacking out in the helix (which is bad) and they closed the queue 10 minutes before the park closed (and I missed my night ride). Analytically, I could say the ride was better but my experience of it was definitely worse. *** Edited 6/22/2006 6:41:39 PM UTC by ApolloAndy***
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
--Greg
"You seem healthy. So much for voodoo."
Two rides that illustrate my point: Boulderdash @ LC, first trip: Fell in love with the park, didn't really 8get* the hype surrounding the ride.
Texas Cyclone @ SFAW: Thought the ride was THE next-best thing to the Original, but the park disappointed, big-time...
That being said, there's alot of factors that go into how I view a particular park or ride, MOST of which I try to take into account, others which I probably don't even realize...
With El Toro, I'd travel thousands of miles to then be treated to 1 train operation, poor dispatches and unexplainable closures. El Toro may be the great, but no thanks.
Tatsu is a GREAT B&M, in a park making some good improvements this year. Still, I've only ridden it once, and probably won't ride it again until the off season. Sorry Shapiro, the parks look great, but the fundamentals still need lots of work! *** Edited 6/22/2006 3:22:53 PM UTC by DWeaver***
You must be logged in to post