"She's my ****ing lady friend!"
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
Robocoaster said:
At any given R-rated bloodbath, there are numerous parents who want to drop their kids off with permission to see the film, without accompanying their kids. they say "Oh they've seen all the Nightmares and Friday the 13ths..." and go on about how they shouldn't be required to go in with their kids. And I'm not talking about teenagers; these kids are like 9, 10 & 11 year-olds. But should the movie have even a flash of nudity, or portray any tenderness of sexuality, they won't let their kids see it at all, period. Makes you wonder...
If there is one issue in cinema that pisses me off more than anything, this is it. It's absolutely ridiculous to me that a movie like Hannibal, which (creepy though it may be) plays half of itself out so that it can shock people with its graphic and disturbing violence; or a film like South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut, which could quite possibly be one of the most outlandishly vulgar movies of all time (though DAMN funny!) deservedly gain R ratings.
Then you get a film like Lost in Translation, which is a mature, subtly brilliant comedy that features two curse words (rapid fire...gotta pay attention if you wanna catch the two sh**s) and a single 45-second scene in a strip club that briefly shows the bared breasts of a couple topless dancers -- and it too is rated R. And why? "For some sexual content," according to the MPAA.
The American ratings system sucks, bottom line. You can show a guy eating a piece of his own dissected brain, or briefly show a naked female breast, and you get the same rating? There's no reason LiT should've been rated R. Of course, if you want to play the nudity argument, go see the PG-13 rated Titanic again and try to convince me politics have nothing to do with it. There's more "sexual content" in the boudoir scene and the car scene than there is anywhere in LiT.
[/end of rant] Whew! Now I feel better! :)
--Dave, who would like to conclude by mentioning that you're all right, and Dogma is, in fact, an amazing film, and that Kevin Smith is my personal favorite movie director working now
*** Edited 2/18/2004 7:54:03 PM UTC by Nitro Dave***
Congrats to Kevin on Green Hornet.
NitroDave, I agree with pretty much everything you said.
-Danny, "We shall all have waffles forthwith!"
-The touching "Whale Rider" gets the same PG-13 rating as gross-out comedies. The official reason is "a brief drug reference." What that is, is a *very* quick shot of a man sleeping on a lounge chair with a bong on his stomach. He doesn't act high and there's no further reference to it. Yet, because of that PG-13 rating, the movie is forced to remove Roger Ebert's quote ("The year's best family film") from its ads, because the MPAA doesn't allow the advertising of PG-13-rated movies to kids.
-"Shakespeare in Love" - rated R. The reason is two very modest shots of Gwyneth Paltrow's breasts, a 5-second sex scene played for laughs, and a couple of mild swear words. Meanwhile, "As Good As It Gets" scores a PG-13, despite a shot of Helen Hunt's breast and much swearing, including two F-words. And "Forrest Gump" gets a PG-13, despite the F-word, a couple of nude scenes, violence, etc. etc.
-"Eyes Wide Shut" - was set for the NC-17 rating, until some genitals were blurred to earn the R. However, that scene still shows a *lot* of sex, including lesbian 69, and still features women's genitals. Yet, now with the R rating, teenagers can see it! Nice work, MPAA!
Note to self....get the unrated version of Eyes Wide Shut. *** Edited 2/18/2004 8:12:19 PM UTC by beast7369***
-Danny
June 11th, 2001 - Gemini 100
VertiGo Rides - 82
I think the bottom line in America is that (despite everyone's objections with the FCC lately) curse words and violence are okay...but God forbid you show anything sexual or drug-related at all. The sad thing is that the kids these movies target are more likely to participate in sex and drugs than in wholesale violence.
Mmm hypocrisy.
And Jeff, I couldn't agree more. I don't want to see Chris O'Donnel in anything ever again. Clothes should be deemed illegal on that guy!;)
Nitro Dave, that's the just the beginning. many parents would rather forfeit $10 for their kids. I'm talking about the ones who begrudgingly buy a ticket to *accompany* their kids, then hit the exits as soon as they pass the doorman's post. We catch as much as this as we can. The kids always say "my parents are in the restroom", or "...getting snacks" or "...using the phone". We tell them "that's fine, but you'll have to wait outside the theatre until your parents get back". I hate being a jerk like that, but it's my job.
speaking of which, it's time for me to go to work at Evil Enemas, errr, I mean Regal Cinemas.:)
They Live. We Sleep.
And I'm a hypocrite; I did the same thing as a kid. Sometimes I got caught, and sometimes I didn't. The first "R" I snuck into was "Excalibur", which, in it's time, not just pushed the envelope, it licked it as well. Very graphic gore and nudity for a 14 yr old. Explains a lot about me...;)
They Live. We Sleep.
They Live. We Sleep.
You must be logged in to post