Hope any of that helped.
People always told me I wasn't right in the head. I don't think that has anything to do with coasters though.
The only thing I found out is I need to keep going further and further from my house to ride differant coasters or wait till parks build new ones.
Once a person becomes a coaster enthusiast they spend more money traveling farther, to ride more coasters, and see different parks.
OrientExpressKid said:
In my case I would not because I am a skinny mofo. I usually have to carry asprin in that case to take care of head ache. But the effects can depend on so much stuff involved (coaster, coaster type, weather, positioning of the body, and whatnot).
See I have to agree, it depends on the person. I'm a really skinny guy, yet love coasters and haven't had any problems from it. So it must really depend on the person...wonder if there are actually any major scientific studies on this?
Haha no I'm not giving Patrick the finger
The traveling thing exposes you to a lot of different areas of the country, and if you're *open* to new ideas and such, you can learn something from pretty much everyone ya meet...in that way (and others) I think it's actually GOOD for your brain...:)
You still have Zoidberg.... You ALL have Zoidberg! (V) (;,,;) (V)
Although I'm sure there's cases of back/neck problems that could come up.
SixFlagsAmericaFan said:
Doctors say it has calming affects (to people who aren't afraid of heights.)
It absolutely has that effect on me. Some doctors know what they're talking about.
*** Edited 5/19/2004 2:18:48 AM UTC by 1EyedJack*** *** Edited 5/19/2004 2:29:57 AM UTC by Jeff***
-Escher
I am alive right now thanks to roller coasters. Long story, but let me just say that being exposed to high G-forces so that you are more used to it is not always a bad thing. Thank god I was.
It sounds to me like a lot of this, if it is true, has to do with the specific roller coaster. Also, all the people mentioned the first article were spot instances. Until there is a study done where they can monitor the people before and after the rides, there is no way to say that the roller coaster itself was the culprit for the injuries described. There could very well be a pre-existing condition that whatever ride they rode on brought out.
Another thing to note is that if this were true, who is to say that it actually was the roller coaster that each of these people went on that did it. How do they know it was the roller coaster and not one of the many other rides in the park.
I am not trying to stick up for anything here, just trying to play devils advocate as the article linked above is, in a sence, accusing roller coasters of brain damager just because a person went on one recently. Remember, when someone asks you what you rode that day at the amusement park, the first rides mentioned are usually the coasters.
You must be logged in to post