Posted
[Ed. note: Contrary to the headline of the paper, there is no apparent danger of the park closing. -J]
After a public hearing, at least one business owner says the park is important to the economy, regardless of the current dispute over roads. A local property owner contends the park is not zoned correctly and disputes the use and ownership of a road near the park.
Read more from The College Heights Herald.
It sounds like Dallas Jones can reference documents showing that the road in question is a county road, so I'm not sure Baker has a leg to stand on with regards to that.
I'm glad the community is standing behind Beech Bend on this.
Jerry
I don't get it. Doesn't he have anything better to do than be a pain?
-Tina
"Who, me? Why, nobody has ever asked me to have fun with them...so THIS is what having fun is all about? Sniff...thank you little girl, THANK YOU!" "Snifffff"
I can see where the local economy could take a hit from the loss of the park. I'm sure many of the same people who come to race or watch the races come to take a tour of the Corvette plant and museum as well. If they hadn't added Rumbler this year, the amusment park could've probably easily moved somewhere else.
IF, you like to knock Knoebels because of its portable rides. But most of those "portable rides" have been there for years, while SF has taken away many flats from its parks according to many TR's, including a couple of yours I think.
RGB said:How long has the park been there, and how long has the zoning been around?
From the Beech Bend website..."Beech Bend has been providing family entertainment since 1898."
Fandango
Pioneer Train
Old Smokey
Haunted Mansion
Cosmotron
Log Flume
Skloosh
Chair Lift
Flying Tigers
Antique Cars
High Speed Thrill Coaster
Bumper Boats
Ol' Smokey
Skooters
Tea Cups
Whip
Motor Boats
Grand Carousel
About half the kiddie rides
Phoenix
Twister
Flying Turns
I don't think it looks like a carnival at all.
You must be logged in to post