Posted
Three days after a massive crowd uproar shook Lake Winnepesaukah, park officials met with Catoosa County Sheriff Phil Summers to discuss ways of preventing future occurrences at the 78-year-old amusement park. Lake Winnepesaukah publicist Talley Rhodes said Tuesday that prior to meeting with the sheriff, the park decided to immediately institute a new guest policy requiring visitors under age 21 to be accompanied by a parent or adult chaperone.
Read more from The Catoosa County News.
------------------
Arena football has arrived in the Windy City. Go "Chicago Rush"
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
------------------
Goccvp1
If I had something inspiring to say, you'd be reading it now.
How old is the average ride op or worker at some of these parks? If under 21, I suppose they will have to and from the front gate by security at the beginning and ending of their shifts.
Again, a case of "zero tolerance" winning out over common sense.
------------------
Kind of hard to take a post as objective if a park or coaster name is part of the "user name"
------------------
www.coasterimage.com
I think it's fine. Weed out the punks who start trouble.
------------------
Is that a Q-bot in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?
------------------
Colossus [1]
Nemesis: Inferno [6]
------------------
SRM 2003-Look for the guy with my name on his chest
You know... when you really come to think of it... The Iraqi "Elite" Republican Guard, or the crowd that I saw at a certain park park about two years ago... Not sure which group would put up more of a fight...
------------------
Kind of hard to take a post as objective if a park or coaster name is part of the "user name"
But the main thing is how is this going to be enforced? Surely they are not going to check the id of every single guest, especially since a lot of people are not going to be carrying wallets or purses into an amusement park.
Personnally I think it's a great idea that would drastically cut down on the problems that we see at parks (line jumping, rude kids, abusive language). At least one park is now going make the PARENTS responsible for their kids, not the park staff.
edit:spelling*** This post was edited by Brian W 4/24/2003 2:03:38 PM ***
------------------
Lets go its on!
Visit History of PKI! *** This post was edited by PKIEMPSOB 4/24/2003 3:22:34 PM ***
Does the park serve alcohol? If it does that could also have led to the 21 rule. If not I can't see it being above 18.
Yes, but a group of 18 & 19 year olds manages to sneak some alcohol into the park. (doesn't seem too difficult) - now they're drinking on park property and if an incident occurs, the park could be found at fault. Make them come with an adult and the park would still face problems but it'd be a lot easier to put the responsibilty on the "chaperone".
It's easy to whine and moan "unfair", but you're complaining in the wrong direction. Find the idiots who caused a problem in the first place.
At least one park is now going make the PARENTS responsible for their kids, not the park staff.
What a novel idea! It's a shame it took something like this to force a park to essentially say "We are not a babysitting service."
------------------
www.coasterimage.com
I wonder what effect this will have on their attendance. I would say that it will cut down on teen attendance. I bet they might get over this eventually if they find that it hurts their attendance.
And by the way, I think that hiring more security staff or giving the existing staff more extensive training might have been a more effective, though costly way to solve this problem.
------------------
The Trip: CP, SFWoA, PKI, KW, HW, IB, SFGAm, MiA and LeSourdsville too.
8 Days- 10 parks. May 2003
------------------
The Empire will Strike Back....
"What do I know, I only work in an Amusement Park?"
"You are paying to get in. Period."
------------------
Is that a Q-bot in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?
No admission without a chaperone if you are under 21 is one way to enforce that. I for one applaud that idea.
Another way to go about it is to make it expesnsive financially to use the park as a minor-care service. Take Kennywood for example. Kennywood does not sell season tickets, furthermore they will not sell the cheap "General Admission Only" tickets to unchaperoned minors. What this results in, is that if a parent wanted to use Kennywood as a daycare, the weeks combined admission fees would be over $100. The parks pricing strategy makes it a great deal for the day visitor, but I must admitedly say, a lousy deal for the local. (And then we aren't even getting into the food and drink needs of the minor. but then I must recall that outside food is welcome at Kennywood.
It all boils down to the same ting, a few bad apples ruin it for everybody else. Thanks to a few bad people, high school students can not travel to the park during the summer. (21 seems to be about the junior year in college) You can thank these same kinds of people when parks institute entrance security, eliminate cheap discount tickets and general admission, and so forth.
<flame suit activated> I for one would not mind seeing "21 and over nights" at parks. My tolerance for minors has gotten quite minimal. Between the foreplay that goes on in the ride lines, to the disruptive behavior when groupsof them get together (vandalism, theft, and the occasional flight), the flagrant line jumping ("And you can't do aa thing about it cause my folks aren't here"), the gross disrespect of the no smoking in queue lines polixy. . Yes,, sign me up for 21-and-over night <flame suit off>.
------------------
----
David Bowers
Mayor, Coasterville
You must be logged in to post