I know that they had a bad riot several years ago and they are trying to preserve a family image but can't they change things just a bit? Why 21? Why not just 18 or 19? How about doing what KW used to do and let teens in by themselves provided that they buy an all-day wristband. If they spend that much to ride, they are more likely to have the right kind of fun and not to cause trouble.
Arthur Bahl
The real tragedy is the minority few that end up ruining something for everybody else.
I've known some very mature teenagers and some very immature twenty-somethings. Requiring an all-day pass plus beefed up security should be enough.
I can see 18, but 21 seems high to me.
Great Lakes Brewery Patron...
-Mark
*** Edited 7/24/2006 4:01:02 PM UTC by coasterguts***
A day at the park is what you make it!
I miss Drachen Fire
Aside from that rant, I feel that most parks need some sort of rule about unsupervised teens, especially that large chain that everyone likes to complain about. At least if these kids are breaking the rules, call mom or dad and let them know, and revoke the season pass privlage. Just my two cents though...
Not a bad idea. I wouldn't mind seeing more parks crack down on unsupervised teens (not that its just teens that are the problem). 21 might be a bit high, but if they're still making money, I guess its not a bad tactic.
"They don't shop, eat, or go to the movies, all they do is hang out." Sounds like most senior citizens you see at the mall too. ;)
Arthur Bahl
If you put too many restrictions on teens at the malls, some of the tenants would complain because of the customers that they would lose.
Interesting POV. When I was in that early teen age (teen years before driving age) hanging at the mall was THE thing to do for kids my age. The mall would be packed end to end with a sea of 13 to 17 year olds. It got so bad that the tenants complained that the kids were driving away business. It was entirely true though. You'd literally see 50 kids for every adult in the mall on a Friday or Saturday evening. No adult wanted to shop there, it was an incredibly uncomfortable environment for anyone over 17.
The mall quickly set in place rules to stop it and they were almost exactly as you mentioned - no unsupervised kids at certain times.
I don't have a problem with the policy at all at amusement parks - especially in places where the population, locations and park pricing is conductive to making the park a local hangout.
RatherGoodBear said:
"They don't shop, eat, or go to the movies, all they do is hang out." Sounds like most senior citizens you see at the mall too. ;)
LOL I never thought of it that way!
Great Lakes Brewery Patron...
-Mark
The irony is the reason most kids are hanging out by themselves with nothing to do is that their parents are working endless hours to provide their kids with a "good life." Yeah, I'll pick you up around 9:30-- now that's quality time.
What about the parents who work endless hours to "make ends meet" - are they bad parents too?
I never really thought about it from the "upper middle class" angle that you propose. I always figured the kids were hanging at the parks that offered free admission or low season pass prices because it was cheap, easy supervision for single mom and dad types forced to work two jobs.
I hope they let them in with a military id even though they are not of age.
Here is the older link to the news story.
http://www.coasterbuzz.com/2003-114-478847.htm *** Edited 7/25/2006 8:32:10 AM UTC by supermandl***
Rob Ascough said:
I thought that something did happen at the park years ago that led to this rule?
Something definitely happened in the park. There was a fight involving 50-100 unsupervised teenagers that started inside the park. Lake Winnie is a family owned business, and I don't think they have ever had to deal with such an outbreak. I grew up going to Lake Winnie and have been going every year for over 30 years. I can totally see why Lake Winnie started a supervision policy. The good news is that they have been doing fantastic business this year. In fact, they just expanded the front parking lot to accomodate more guests. Judging by the attendance at the park, I don't think it has hurt the park at all. If you like gangs, fights, and hoodlums, I would strongly recommend you to go to Magic Mountain in California. A night trip to that park should refocus anyone's bad opinion of this supervision policy.
coasterkitty said:
If you like gangs, fights, and hoodlums, I would strongly recommend you to go to Magic Mountain in California. A night trip to that park should refocus anyone's bad opinion of this supervision policy.
LOL....it felt that way to my colleague who went with me to SFMM at 3 in the afternoon :)
Lord Gonchar said:
What about the parents who work endless hours to "make ends meet" - are they bad parents too?
Not meant to be a judgement, just an observation. The really bad parents drop their kids off, then go get drunk or high.
As far as the "class" issue, I've never witnessed really bad behavior in parks-- just occasional line jumping and general rudeness/obnoxious behavior. But most of what I've seen is done by kids (and young adults) wearing clothing with designer labels, and various "league authorized replica jerseys." Very little Faded Glory and Keds.
You must be logged in to post