Posted
Lake Compounce Amusement Park unveiled plans for a new roller coaster Friday morning at the park. The roller coaster's theme is fear, turning riders upside-down 150 feet in the air, through an enclosed space and around several turns at a speed reaching 65 MPH, according to Lake Compounce officials.
Read more from The Hartford Courant and Hartford Business.
So why are these things (seemingly) so popular? Are they cheap? Is it the small footprint (which maybe leads to the cheapness)? Boomerangs seem like they're super marketable, super cheap, and super compact. B:TR's are also marketable and their main prevalence was championed by a single company. I don't get what's the draw for the 3 different companies that have/are going to put one of these things in.
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
It's probably because they're really good rides with a minimal physical footprint.
The Maurer Skyloops (http://rcdb.com/r.htm?ot=2&mo=8447) are fairly horrible IMHO.
These, on the other hand, are awesome.
I develop Superior Solitaire when not riding coasters.
Why look: koolcat tossed us up some word salad.
Life is something that happens when you can't get to sleep.
--Fran Lebowitz
I'm excited for it. It's awesome that we're getting a lapbars-only version. A custom layout would have been great, but it's still exciting to have any premier coaster in CT.
And josh I agree these do seem to be the new impulse, but with a bit more too them.
Interesting. I significantly prefer the impulses to these guys. Especially the models with holding brakes (are any still running with holding brakes active?). I get that they're small and probably relatively cheap, but I didn't think they (SFDK's anyway) was that good and the capacity was pretty bad.
What's so bad about the skyloops?
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
Andy, I can't speak for any others, but Possessed at Dorney still has an active holding brake on the straight spike.
The amusement park rises bold and stark..kids are huddled on the beach in a mist
http://support.gktw.org/site/TR/CoastingForKids/General?px=1248054&...fr_id=1372
Spelling a word wrong in a title or name is just plain wrong! Kause I said so. Oh-wait.
-Travis
www.youtube.com/TSVisits
I really loved Sky Rocket, I love Premier coasters, glad they're getting more work, and already loved LC. Bring it on!
I really need to ride Tempesto.
For all of you saying they are cheap, they really aren't. Apparently Phobia Phear Coaster, which I somehow got through spellcheck, costs 8 million. That's Rmc money and while they aren't really expensive, that isn't that cheap, especially since they run 1 train and 800ft of track.
jonnytips said:
They really didn't need to spell it like that; phor phuck's sake
The name is stupid and nonsensical, ignoring it's misspelling. But it's whatever.
"The term is 'amusement park.' An old Earth name for a place where people could go to see and do all sorts of fascinating things." -Spock, Stardate 3025
I'm sure it's more of a space issue than a cost issue. LC wants something high thrills, highly marketable, and they don't want to take up too much space. And lets face it, this will be a win with the public. There's nothing else like it in the area and it can be (legitimately) marketed as such. I'd be disappointed if Cedar Point got one, for sure, but I'd understand, capacity issues aside.
As for Phobia Phear, is that really any different than Phoenix Phall Phunfest. We all let that one slide, don't we? Perhaps it's just because it's so easy to say "PPP."
You must be logged in to post