I'm trying to envision this beast, what's it like?
-----------------
Just wait till next year!
I can't say enough good things about Kraken.
And I do believe that the best sensations on floorless coasters is the front. From there, Kraken really delivers.
I'd add that the front two rows of one train had virgin wheels on it. Unfortunately, those two rows were on the trade show floor at IAAPA. :(
-----------------
Jeff - Webmaster/Admin - CoasterBuzz.com
"As far as I can tell it doesn't matter who you are. If you can believe, there's something worth fighting for..." - Garbage, "Parade"
Cheers,
-----------------
Bob Hansen
"Excuse me while I kick the sky!"
kickthesky@hotmail.com
Out of the three I'd say Kraken is far and away the best. Then again, I'm an airtime person, not an intensity person (see that thread for more info)
Hulk is an intensity ride. It's far from a bad ride but to me it was one of the few coasters I've been on that didn't live up to the hype. I first rode in Dec 1999 and came off feeling sort of neutral - it didn't blow me away but it wasn't bad by any means. The first half of the ride is rather good - the back half is less thrilling. Subsequent visits to IOA never changed that opinion.
Kumba was a bit of a disappointment. Again, not a bad ride but it was (and I've had many people argue this one with great passion) the headbangingest B&M I've ever experienced. Not even close to as bad as and SLC or old Arrow's with OSTR's but for a B&M it seemed pretty rough. Perhaps I just had a bad ride like Jeff with Kraken, who knows?
Out of the three I'd say Kraken and Hulk are about equal and your favorite will depend on the type of experience you prefer. Kumba lags behind these two but is still a top quality ride.
Let me say it again: These are just my opinions, other's opinions will certainly differ.
.
*** This post was edited by Lord Gonchar on 12/7/2001. ***
I'm sure it can be a good ride, but at the same time I think the front seat is critical. I rode Batman at SFWoA in the front this year for the first time since media day the year before, and was blown away, despite a lot of mediocrity in other seats in between.
-----------------
Jeff - Webmaster/Admin - CoasterBuzz.com
"As far as I can tell it doesn't matter who you are. If you can believe, there's something worth fighting for..." - Garbage, "Parade"
Kraken was the most flawless coaster I've ridden. There was nothing *wrong* about it. It may not be very intense, but looking at the target audience, I do not this that was a design flaw, but rather a design parameter (see HersheyPak's Great Beat and Lightning Racer). Everything felt just in place to me and Kraken is my 3rd favorite B&M behind Raging Bull and Montu.
How does it compare to Kumba and Hulk. Well, I'm not really a good person to ask about Hulk because I like ulk about as much as I like Raptor and I dont think we need to go down that road again. but as for Kumba, Kumba and Kraken are almost identical layout/pacing wise, but Kumba is about 50 times more intense. The camelback inversion on Kubma is FIERCE! I like them both very much (Kumba is right behind Kraken on the B&M list). They do the same thing, but very differently: one with the grace of a ballerina (Kraken) and the other with the brute force of a hockey player (Kumba).
"Yeah, like foreplay"- The Cutting Edge (a quote from a movie worse than 'Batman Forever'.
jeremy
--"Tonight, in this very[/] ring.." Vince McMahon
I'm wondering why everyone is recommending the front though. Is it for the visuals? As far as the ride goes I think the back of Kraken gives a much better experience. Maybe I'm just the odd man out.
.
*** This post was edited by Lord Gonchar on 12/7/2001. ***
*** This post was edited by ravenguy98 on 12/7/2001. ***
Although I think that the first 3 seconds of Hulk are mind blowing, the second half of the ride is slow and boring. I rate them Kraken, Kumba, Hulk.
You must be logged in to post