Posted
A statewide vote being proposed by Cleveland Mayor Jane Campbell that would allow casino gambling in Ohio's larger cities would include not only Elyria and Lorain, but also Erie County because it is home to tourist-magnet Cedar Point. If passed, Cedar Fair CEO Dick Kinzel says his company would likely add gambling to its entertainment offerings.
Read more from The Morning Journal.
Link: PointBuzz
I've never felt more safe in a crowded public place than I have virtually anywhere in Las Vegas.
Whoever said CP would be overrun by bums - ha. You know a lot of bums who would pay $45 just for the privilege of hanging out in a casino?
If they regulate it then the negative impacts would be minimal. A Cedar Point isn't about to ruin their reputation if they get into the casino game.*** This post was edited by wahoo skipper 3/11/2005 3:43:47 PM ***
I think it's a good idea :)
-- Alan "give me a quarter, i love quarters" Jacyszyn
By the way, I would love to have casinos in Sandusky for the increased revenues for the area, but Vegas will always be the place to really gamble.
*** This post was edited by tambo 3/11/2005 4:34:42 PM ***
I'd rather go to a CF owned one any day.
Reminds me of another park when the thought of riverboat gambling came up in PA.....
rolo: There is no evidence or data that concludes casinos come with an increase in crime. Bums can't afford to gamble. And crime lords? Dude, you've seen too many movies.
Okay- I will leave what happens in the state of Ohio to the people who live in the state of Ohio. Maybe increased gambling will be beneficial, maybe it won't.
And about the crime lords part- I was just exagerating. My crime ring has never included VF. Heck, we've never been out of Minnesota.
I think it would be a bad idea for Ohio to go down this path; that said, if I had the option to visit the Cedar Point Casino, I'd be there for a pleasant hour of giving away money to the slot machines.
This would be such a big step towards tje realization of turning the park into a year-round tourist draw. I definitely wouldn't mind heading over there one weekend in the off season to play some hold 'em and have some fun. It could also be a step in the right direction for creating a decent night life around the park.
They collect rent, they fill their hotels, they run foodservice, they have housing, they run parking, they remove snow, and the list is endless. Its the same comparison if the Indians or the Browns wanted to co sign for a license, or ante up some property. If Cedar Point can make a buck in the off season, they will try and do it.
And hear this loud and clear: If the craphole(s) Chippewa Lake, Summit Beach, Idora Park, Euclid Beach, etc were still mulling along, they would be the first at the State Capital building with Chief Big Fart in tow with an agreement. I can also bet my career that Conneaut Lake Park would make every effort to jam the largest floating house of gambling on that lake the very second Harrisburg said they could gamble across the state line.
Cold facts. The 2 largest seasonal parks in the US. SF Great Adventure and Moreys Piers, employ a combined 300 year round and 5000 seasonally, and grosss probably $300 million. That is a lot of labor for those dollars. In comparison, Bally's Atlantic City employees 4000 year round and grosses over $900 million. You do the math. Atlantic City alone has 55,000 full time workers at the 13 casinos. Casinos are a cash machine that generate money 24/7. Parks, you have about 100 days total.
Cedar Point is simply stating that if they can do it, they want to make a few bucks, keep some seasonal help working, keep the parking lots full, keep the hotels going, and God forbid, make a few bucks. If I had a choice between downtown Cleveland and that mystery smell, or a proven resort with new hotels, resturants, and a new indoor waterpark, I know my decision.
*** This post was edited by Agent Johnson 3/13/2005 10:46:23 AM ***
You must be logged in to post