What I'm saying is the cars are massive - lots of aerodynamic drag & increased friction from the numerous wheel assemblies, gear drives as well as loss of kinetic energy to spin the seats really slow them down.
This means not much more can be added to a layout like X's. Unless it's all on flat land as X's station is some distance above the lowest point of the ride.
I'm eager to see what other wicked elements Arrow can come up with & on an out & back layout, not fig 8 (top view) like X .
Oh, the turn around could be easily ridden in the flying position.
I'm betting the next one will be called the Hammerhead.
(Sorry if this is all confusing, I'm not 100% after watching that video! )
*** This post was edited by Taipan on 12/28/2001. ***
One of the things Bolingbroke mentioned at IAAPA as a possibility was a putting the ride entirely in one plane. Take a long narrow strip of land and put it all in there. Wouldn't that be odd? It would be like a giant pachinko machine!
-----------------
Jeff - Webmaster/Admin - CoasterBuzz.com, Sillynonsense.com
"As far as I can tell it doesn't matter who you are. If you can believe, there's something worth fighting for..." - Garbage, "Parade"
*** This post was edited by DWeaver on 12/28/2001. ***
You must be logged in to post