Friday, March 19, 2004 3:01 PM
Although I'm sure a few of you already admit to doing this, but I thought it was a good idea anyways.
After the ride, and you get off, and you like your picture on the ride, but you don't really feel like paying the $12.95 for it. Take a picture with your digital camera of the screen where your picture is. (film works but digital is better) and that way you can have a free picture. I did that on my vacation and the pictures turned out great. I must have saved about a hundred bucks. I know this is kinda stupid, and you probably already thought of this, but I thought I would just share the thought.
Red Garter Rob
Friday, March 19, 2004 3:03 PM
Is the off season over yet?
Friday, March 19, 2004 3:05 PM
It's been brought up before. I say it's "Ghetto Fabulous."
Friday, March 19, 2004 3:16 PM
And if you don't have a digital camera, just borrow a friend's digital camera, and then buy a disposable camera, and take a photo of the screen on your friend's digital camera after you take a photo of the on-ride photo screen with the digital camera.
Friday, March 19, 2004 3:30 PM
Then take THAT photo to the park's *charicaturist* (chiarosciurist?), and you can get a fifth-generation portrait...:)
Friday, March 19, 2004 3:35 PM
I saw people doing this at Disney World. I can see doing it for photos that I don't really care to have... but wait these are photos I don't really want. I just buy the on rides photos that I want... usually the ones where my family is scared to death. :)
Friday, March 19, 2004 3:43 PM
Doesn't work if you're a vampire.
Oh lord...it really is an off season!
Friday, March 19, 2004 4:01 PM
M:TR offers free on-ride pics....
mOOSH [well...someone has to say it!]
Friday, March 19, 2004 4:09 PM
I prefer to Photoshop my head over someone else's onride photo that I find online. Then I save park admission fees, too.
Friday, March 19, 2004 4:22 PM
At a minimum charge of $60 an hour (or any portion thereof), I would hope they're free, mOOSH! Afterall, they're just stills off the webcam, aren't they? ;)
Friday, March 19, 2004 4:24 PM
Hmmmm, uhhh, yeah, o.k.