How much better is X-Flight/Batwing Compared to St

Sunday, July 15, 2001 11:52 AM
I know they added the helix and inline twists....but is it any better? Does Stealth have better capactiy then the crappy ones of X-Flight and Batwing? Are they pretty much the same? Any info would be appreciated!

-------------
It's usually fun to be me, but sometimes I need a little love too. --Jeff
+0
Sunday, July 15, 2001 11:53 AM
Well, I haven't been on Batwing/X-Flight but I know Stealth has ok capacity and loading times. Everytime I go the wait is only 20-30 minutes.

-------------
Shut up when I'm talking to you!"- Linkin Park
+0
Sunday, July 15, 2001 12:03 PM
Man....what a deal...short waits one the prototype of one of the most inovative coasters in the world! I have noticed that all of paramounts big rides one year lose popularity next year such as Son of Beast! Maybe tha6s how H:XLC will be!

-------------
It's usually fun to be me, but sometimes I need a little love too. --Jeff
+0
Sunday, July 15, 2001 2:47 PM
If X Flight and batwing only run 2 trais than Stelth's is better. It seems that Stelth has a short wait even though the loading times seem slow! The crew at PGA are probibly better than SFWoA and SFA.

-------------
Steel top 5
1.S:TE
2.Stelth
3.B:TR
4. Riddler's Revenge
5. Goliath
+0
Sunday, July 15, 2001 2:57 PM
I hear that Batwing has just gone from one train to two. With two loading platforms and reclining on the hill when everything is working as designed, Batwing/X-Flight should have much better capacity than Stealth.
+0
Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:06 AM
Plus Batwing has three trains, not sure if one is designated as a spare or if they plan to run all three at some point (run all three? at a Six Flags? hahaha).
+0

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums - ©2018, POP World Media, LLC
Loading...