Friday, October 26, 2007 5:13 AM
Another whack job animal rights group will award you some cash if you can provide legitimate proof that this park abuses animals.
Friday, October 26, 2007 8:15 AM
Peta is very pushy, and misleading about a lot of things, particularly with abuse of animals, personally, I don't believe that SFDK would abuse they're animals. They also tried to say that dogs and cats aren't pets, and that we should set them free, that's when I stopped believing any part of what they say. As it turns out, a lot of the animals that Peta seized ended up in the dumpsters behind they're office in the Carolinas, and that's horrible. Don't believe anything these guys say unless you see it with your own eyes, and apparently they haven't and they are desperate to do so.
Friday, October 26, 2007 8:53 AM
People still take PETA seriously?
Friday, October 26, 2007 8:56 AM
MMM... PETA with chicken salad amd mayo. I know what animal I am going to abuse for my lunch today! OH, not THAT pita, sorry for the confusion. (And the ironic but bad pun)
Friday, October 26, 2007 9:00 AM
The article isn't about PETA.
Friday, October 26, 2007 9:02 AM
Eh, PETA protested on SFDK before, and on the whole Cockroach eating thing.
Friday, October 26, 2007 9:14 AM
Yeah, I hadn't read it at the time, and was assuming Brght's post was referencing said article. :)
Friday, October 26, 2007 9:30 AM
I'm pretty big on animal rights and proper treatment of animals (you can imagine how I feel about Michael Vick) but some of these animal rights groups do more harm than good. I'm not saying it's outside the realm of possibility that SFDK abuses its animals but it's not any more possible than animal abuse at the local petting zoo or the San Diego Zoo. Unless I have a very good reason to believe otherwise, I don't think there's anything to this. Probably just someone or a group of people with an ax to grind.
Friday, October 26, 2007 10:49 AM