Well, no it's still a safety issue to a certain degree, and I'm fairly certain that an exemption would not apply to all rides.
janfrederick said:
"Crystalcat: That's interesting. It would mean that in CPs case, the requirements are not really for safety."
CrystalKat said:
"To an extent, height requirements are also for maturity. Sure, 48" means that someone will be adequately restrained, but so would someone who is 46" -- however, they're likely to be 2-3 years younger (possibly in the 7-8 year old range) and the coaster, while it looks like fun, may be too scary for children that young. The verification of this is that at Cedar Point, if you are someone who naturally does not meet the height requirement through whatever physical condition, but you are an adult (proven via driver's license, etc) you can get a pass to ride coasters even if you do not meet the requirement, assuming that you have no physical disability that would prevent you from riding regardless of your height."
You must be logged in to post