I think this height restriction could hamper the potential of this park in future years. I don't believe that every new coaster has to be 200 feet or more because there are many great coasters under 155 feet, but if I was building a new park I would want an option to be able to go higher if I felt the park needed it.
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
If youre worried, think of it this way: A restriction will only force designers to get creative, which is becoming a lost art at many parks today.
Timbers crew 08
I had a dream of riding in a underwater coaster tunnel and I had a good time in the dream so I figure I'd have fun in reality too. *** Edited 7/14/2007 11:05:11 PM UTC by MAGXL200***
I guess they could tunnel an observation tower and make it another Plummet Mall. :)
rollergator said:
^You *always* see the glass half-full...
Or in this case, the tunnel half full. :)
BogeyMon said:
If that 155 foot limit applies to all construction, it does make for so-so drop towers, space shots, observation towers and the like.I guess they could tunnel an observation tower and make it another Plummet Mall.
I would beg to differ. Not trying to bring up the accident at SFKK, but Superman Tower of Power is a pretty decent drop tower being around 160ft tall.
My favorite MJ tune: "Billie Jean" which I have been listening to alot now. RIP MJ.
I'll take the shoulder-banging every time. :)
rollergator said:
By the time you get to the *second-tier* shot rides of 170'-ish (Dr Doom, Dorney, etc.), the additional height means there's no momentum left at the top, and no good airtime.I'll take the shoulder-banging every time.
You must be logged in to post