http://marriottschool.byu.edu/cfe/resources/cases/geaugalake.pdf
It’s old information (1988), but what I found particularly interesting is that it provided a complete P&L for Geauga Lake during the 1989 season. I had never seen this kind of detail for a park’s financials before, and thought you guys might find it interesting as well… Joel *** Edited 4/20/2005 6:12:40 PM UTC by JZarley*** *** Edited 4/20/2005 6:14:01 PM UTC by JZarley***
Of course, what they decided on was Turtle Beach, a water play area designed specifically for children. At the time, and for many years to follow, it was widely regarded as the best children's water play area in the country. It was quite popular and even without a major coaster they had a great year in '89 and followed it up strong in '90.
It goes to show that you need not build the highest, fastest rollercoasters in order to succeed in the park business. Six Flags went vertical at Geauga Lake and what do they have to show for it? A "former" park.
-Matt
Resident Arrow Dynamics Whore
In my opinion, the resurgence of wood coasters can be traced back to the Texas Giant and Raging Wolf Bobs. Prior to then it was steel, steel, steel. The Bobs generated amazing publicity considering the size of Geauga Lake. Of course, most coaster enthusiasts will say the Bobs doesn't hold a candle to the original Bobs but the comparison was enough to draw a lot of interest.
The uniqueness of Geauga Lake was that not only was it pay one price for wet and dry rides, but the water area was pretty decent, particularly for the kids. The question will be can the market respond with enthusiasm if, down the road, Cedar Fair decides to have two separate gates?
Finally, Geauga Lake's timing couldn't be better for the Turtle Beach expansion. '89 and '90 were some of the hottest and dryest summers in the past 20 years. That certainly helps the waterpark business.
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
You must be logged in to post