Posted
A former employee of Six Flags Great Adventure is suing the amusement park, claiming management falsified the circumstances of his departure in order to hurt his chances of employment elsewhere. The 67-year-old says the park tried to make him look bad for going to the press over the treatment of international employees.
Read more from Asbury Park Press.
I hate this sue happy world!
Isn't it interesting that he's suing for the park having "falsified the circumstances of his departure in order to hurt his chances of employment elsewhere", yet he admits that he has a BETTER JOB that pays probably alot more than his employment at the park did.
ALSO, isn't is peculiar that the Union backs up the park, and not the employee?
Sadly, regardless of what park chain I visit, the "International Employees" all seem to work about 200% harder than the average American Employee. ( I know there are ride ops that read this board, and i'm not speaking of *everyone* but employees in general) Folks wonder why AOL has it's tech assist department in INDIA? 'cause they still have work ethics, and value employment.
Dollywoodrideop
Don't be greedy this holiday season!
There are two issues. The first asks if his termination or alleged "falsification" came as a result of his complaints regarding the treatments of international employees. If it's retribution, the park is in trouble, according to the article, because of New Jersey's whistle blower law.
The second, and harder thing to prove, is whether or not he suffered loss as a result of the park's actions. If it's a jury trial, he might have a shot there, since "loss" could be defined pretty broadly.
And Indians, Asians, or pretty much any immigrants do, in my experience work harder when they come to this country, at least among programmers. I've been on enough teams as the "token white boy" to see that.
1) This probably wouldn't have made the paper at all if the business involved was something other than an amusement park. Law suits relating to terminations are pretty common, and are usually settled quietly out of court with adjustments to the details of the departure.
2) While I'm not familiar with New Jersey's whistle blower law, most whistle blower laws protect the whistle blower for reporting issues to the authorities, not for reporting them to the press, unless the authorities are notified first. They also usually provide only limited protection when the accusations are not well founded. Again, I don't know the particulars, just givng some idea of the possibilities.
You must be logged in to post