Nor do I for anyone else who chooses to partake..
However, my money is best saved for other concerts that I feel give me more value.. Like up close with B52s at Busch :)
I appreciate Dave's music, not his pricing vs venue. Im sure we all have that "one" where you say.. "Yeah not for that much money".
* Twitter *
Yeah, like the Stones. You probably couldn't pay me enough to go see them, but that's just because I don't like them, and think they're overrated. :)
Raven-Phile said:
LOL. I might even pay $90, but that's depending on location.He tends to use a lot of that money toward his charity, Bama Works, which is A-OK with me. I also really like that all their buses and rigs run on bio diesel, which might have a small impact, but it's better than nothing.
He's also got volunteers that get into concerts for free so long as they help pick up cans, or pass out info on charity/environmental stuff. I really like what he's doing, and I support that.
Does that mean he's stopped emptying his buses' toilets on unsuspecting boaters? :)
I don't post frequently but to further add to this tangent from the main topic, did anyone catch U2 in Charlottesville or Raleigh last October? U2's price scheme for the show was pretty equitable with at least 10,000 $30 tickets behind the Claw while charging $55 for GA standing on the field tickets and then charging $95 and $250 for the more premier seats to make up for the cheapo tickets.
For an artist of U2's caliber, $30 seems like a pretty good bargain especially for the impressive production of their live show. Decent ticket pricing can still be achieved by artists so long as they're willing to take calculated risks that a large amount of people attend the show.
I just felt like getting in my 2 cents since we're talking about concert ticket prices. I'm done. :-)
You must be logged in to post