Even then, just because there's a patent doesn't mean you can't build something similar. Either you pay a royalty to the patent holder, license the technology, or make it different enough that you can get around it.
Don't we have a member here that works for the USPTO?
-----------------
Jeff - Webmaster/Admin - CoasterBuzz.com
"As far as I can tell it doesn't matter who you are. If you can believe, there's something worth fighting for..." - Garbage, "Parade"
*** This post was edited by TITAN_FAN_13 on 11/24/2001. ***
On in-house ride systems, the patents would belong to Universal Creative. Those systems include Spiderman, Poseidon, and Cat in the Hat (I think).
I'm not sure about the other ride systems, though. Those may or may not have been outsourced to other vendors.
~ Michael ~
He said when he first talked to B&M about the ride, he went through a big spiel about the catapult lift inside a tunnel, the number of and types of inversions. One of them stopped him and asked, "do you want a good coaster?" Pretty cool story if you ask me.
I don't know who would hold the patent, but I would assume it would be Universal because they came up with it.
-------------
Mayday - Memorial Day Weekend - Nonpoint, Nickelback, Oleander, Staind
Ozzfest - June 8 - Drowning Pool, Papa Roach, Linkin Park, Disturbed, Black Sabbath
Awake Tour- June 15 - Darwin's Waiting Room, Puddle of Mudd, Deftones, Godsmack
CPgenius said:
Actually, Universal had a lot to do with the design of the at least the catapult launch system...in an interview, the 3rd man in charge of the project explains how they welded two box cars together and tilted them up at a fairly steep angle to simulate the tunnel. They hooked themselves up to a row of seats that were connected to a weight at the end of cable. They would put different amounts of weight on the end of the cable to simulate different G accelerations. He said they would show up in their "crash dummy-esque" suits with pads and everything. They tested it a 1/2 G, 1 G, 4 G, and 6 G...they eventually agreed on 1 G.
I'd believe that :-) So, it may very well be that Universal Creative got patents for the launch system, while the remaining portions of the ride would be considered a part of a previously filed patent by B&M. Perhaps that's why we haven't seen another similar launch (brownouts aside)?
Also, while Uni. Creative may have had some, well. . .shall we say "suggestions" as to what course the ride would take, the actual engineering/technology is handled by B&M. That's pretty clear since the cobra roll wound up over the lagoon - that wasn't an accident. It's interesting to note that Walt Disney Imagineering does things a little differently, and, I believe, that actual track plans for their coasters are designed in-house, only to be manufacturered by outside vendors.
~ Michael ~
-----------------
Jeff - Webmaster/Admin - CoasterBuzz.com
"As far as I can tell it doesn't matter who you are. If you can believe, there's something worth fighting for..." - Garbage, "Parade"
-----------------
Coasters are like a fine wine, they get better with age.
-------------
Mayday - Memorial Day Weekend - Nonpoint, Nickelback, Oleander, Staind
Ozzfest - June 8 - Drowning Pool, Papa Roach, Linkin Park, Disturbed, Black Sabbath
Awake Tour- June 15 - Darwin's Waiting Room, Puddle of Mudd, Deftones, Godsmack
Remember first, that it is one thing to be the person who applies for a patent and another to be the person or corporation who owns the patent. If I invent something at work, I would be the person applying for the patent, but the rights would be assigned to my employer. In the case of a situation such as designing the coasters for IOA, who owns the patent would depend more on the contracts involved than on who did the actual work.
I do know that DD uses Silicon Graphics servers to weigh and dispatch the trains...
-----------------
WCUSA-The World's largest theme park is coming!
Theme parks will NEVER be the same!
-Natalie
Well, IS he a member here?
-----------------
Jeff - Webmaster/Admin - CoasterBuzz.com
"As far as I can tell it doesn't matter who you are. If you can believe, there's something worth fighting for..." - Garbage, "Parade"
Jeff said:
"Don't we have a member here that works for the USPTO?"
Seriously though, to the best of my knowledge, B&M only hold two (2) US Patents; one for their "fixed-bogie suspended coaster" (e.g. Batman: The Ride) and one for a "lap restraint system" (e.g. for Apollo's Chariot). I have seen a patent from the EPO (European Patent Office) for a "vertical drop coaster" (e.g. Oblivion) but it was in French so I couldnt read the *entire* application.
As for the legalities of 'patent infringment', as Jeff said, the owner of a patent (not necessarily the inventor, see Jim F's comments) can sell the rights to make or use the device to whomever she wants. There *can* be exclusivity contracts, but this is not *always* the case. Additionally, patents can expire. The maximum patent term is now 20 years from the date of application filing. However, the patent owner must pay the requisite "maintainence fees" every few years to keep the patent valid. If they dont pay the fees, then the patent lapses and becomes part of the public domain.
Anyway, I dont know if Universal has anything on "Hulk" or "Dueling Dragons". If you are *really* curious go to the USPTO website ( http://www.uspto.gov/ ) and search the patents for "Universal" and "coaster" or "amusement device/ride" or something like that and see what comes up. Happy hunting!
ciao,
moi
--Yeah, I could do it for you (much faster even) but what would be the fun in that?
You must be logged in to post