--Dave Althoff, Jr
Anyway, rollercoasters and other high intensity rides like the newer flats can indeed be a health risk. If you are not in good shape than these rides are not for you. NOW, the rides are designed to be safe for the overwhelming majority of those "under the Bell Curve", but if you are an 'outlyer' then yes, there are some risks: LOW RISKS, but risks nonetheless.
lata,
jeremy
--but what I want to know is, how many ppl per year are killed by their VCRs?
2Hostyl said:
--but what I want to know is, how many ppl per year are killed by their VCRs?
VCR's, I'm not sure about, but I know there's been cases of children crushed under large-screen TVs...
There, proof that TV is bad for you! Gasp! Outlaw 'em!
-------------
--Greg
"The questions ticket agents ask at airports are useless, but give an illusion of security to the GP. Much like seatbelts on roller coasters...
My page
WE REALLY SHOULD do something to set everything straight.
-----------------
SFGAm 2003: B&M Flyer!?!?!
2Hostyl said:
You know ravenguy, it's funny that you say we shouldnt be discussing things politically,
I didn't say that, I said this was in no way shape or form a Left vs. Right issue, and it shouldn't be a political issue period. (Its just unfortunate that some politicians want to make it one.) If you think it is a Left vs. Right or Democrat vs. Republican issue or whatever, you can convince me here, or at ravenguy98@yahoo.com but trust me, you're going to have a very hard time of it.
I think the bottom line is that stations are looking for something to put on TV, people in general think coasters are interesting, so they air something like this, getting ratings, and getting sponsor $$$$$. I mean, this is just one story out of 1000s of others that come out of the media everyday just think about what else they are getting wrong. That's the bottom line. The media effects public views to the effect that some people have claimed that he the mass media is the 4th branch of the federal government, and to an extent, they are completely right. The difference is that except for PBS, NPR etc... (god bless 'em) the media has to sell something in order to make $$$$, which is immediately going to affect the quality of the information that is supplied to us. That's just the way it is. Final points:
The mass media does this with everything, not just coasters. Its not a liberal issue, its not a conservative issue, its a monetary issue. We all agree that coasters are safe, so why alienate anyone from your side of the argument by saying something negative about a certain political ideology? It just doesn't make sense to me.
The mass media does this with everything, not just coasters. Its not a liberal issue, its not a conservative issue, its a monetary issue.
I agree completely. I was talking about this over the weekend with some ultra-conservative friends who were talking about how sick they were of the "liberal media" trying to "dig up a story on Enron". I replied "You mean the same liberal media that dug up a story on sex in the White House during the LAST presidency?"
They had no answer to that ;)
Media looks for hype. Roller coasters continue to be an unfortunate target. It sucks, but that's how it works.
-------------
--Greg
"The questions ticket agents ask at airports are useless, but give an illusion of security to the GP. Much like seatbelts on roller coasters...
My page
First, title of report is Report: Roller Coaster riders risk brain injury. Lol in the first paragraph it says "...recently published article in a medical journal that warns emergency room physicians to be on the lookout for injured patients who might have recently visted an amusement park." It says injury rates increased 95% from 1996-1999. Boy that's just great info right there.
Here's the worst part IMO, and you can say if I'm right. It says one of the cases was a 77-year-old man who suffered nausea, vomiting, and headaches after a ride, and died 13 days later. That definatly fits into the catagory of knowing if your body age and conditions can handle rides.
-----------------
"Well I heard that guys with long signatures are just trying to make up for a shortage in their pants..."
Now, it is a liberal or conservative issue? That's up for debate. But historically, conservatives tend to advocate private sector solutions whereas liberals go for govenmental influence. Where does this issue (or non-issue as it were) fall?
Two: PBS is just as influenced by money as private stations. I doubt very seriously the "Carnegie Corporation of New York" would consistantly fund programming that was unacceptable to them.
Oh and Greg, the sex stuff wasnt an issue worthy of TV until the "big bad Conservative attack dog" Ken Starr brought it up :)
jeremy
--I can do this all night ;)
GregLeg said:
"You mean the same liberal media that dug up a story on sex in the White House during the LAST presidency?"
I can guarantee you that if there was a conservative in the White House that they would have been pulling for him to be impeached. Many of them still claimed that Clinton should stay in office because of all the good he had done. If you are that far under the microscope of the media, you think he wouldn't have been that moronic to make a mockery of the Presidencial status by his actions.
There were very few people in the media that wanted him to be impeached, one of which was David Brinkley. He didn't conform to his liberal colleagues.
With that aside, I think that it's pathetic how the facts in these reports are skewed. I've also thought of the many times how my local paper gets the facts completely wrong over coaster stories, and then I think to myself all the other stuff they mis-report.
-------------
Sept. 11th 2001, Slayer released God Hates Us All. The song "Disciple" uncannily describes the events of that day, as well as the antrax letters that followed.
--Slayer: Thrash band, or the next Nostradamus?
*** This post was edited by CPgenius on 2/4/2002. ***
But I do not believe that that act alone made a "mockery" of the office. And I'd be willing to be that over half of the voting aged Americans agree.
jeremy
--who just needs to shut the hell up now (que?)
...this crap is just that ... crapola!
supermandl said:
Comparing cars(and drunk drivers)to coasters is just plain crazy, compare how many people drive and are on the roads everyday compared to how many people ride coasters, it is a big diffirence.
Yes it is a big difference. About 40,000 people were killed last year in automotive accidents. One was killed in a roller coaster accident. While I don't really think that it's a fair comparison for the coaster side, coasters actually have a lower fatality rate per passenger mile than automobiles.
*** This post was edited by supermandl on 2/5/2002. ***
You must be logged in to post