THIS IS NUTS!
I've been riding coasters and flats for 15 years now, and never had a problem....
Based on the trend, I won't be able to ride half the coasters out there in a couple of years. And what the hell am I supposed to do in 5 years? Looks like I'll have to stop giving my and my family's business to the parks.
Sad, sad, sad. I absolutely cannot believe this industry trend and what it seems to mean to me.
[ Edit - accidently submitted before I was ready. Must be THAT upset about this....;) ]
*** This post was edited by Doug Rowe 4/28/2003 8:48:19 AM ***
The question is does TR:TR now have a max height limit since the restraints on that and Delerium are identical?
------------------
Scott W. Short
scott@midwestcoastercentral.com
http://www.midwestcoastercentral.com
Personally, I think arbitrary maximum height limits make no sense, but a maximum limit for Delirium...or for that matter, for virtually any feet-dangling ride...is perfectly understandable. Thing is, that limit should be based not on the rider's overall height, but rather on the clearance available for the feet. So on Delirium, for instance, there should be a test seat out front configured so that if your feet can reach the ground, you can't ride. If your feet can't reach the ground, you can ride provided you can get the shoulder bar down. THAT is how the height limit should be set, not by some arbitrary measurement.
Just my opinion, of course... :)
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
Who is too short for this to make much difference to him anyway.
He didn't wait for Deja Vu due to the height limit posted.
------------------
I'd rather die living than live like I'm dead
http://www.webtechnik.com/ebony/CPLady.htm
------------------
I am one.
I am Turbo.
------------------
I am one.
I am Turbo.
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
That's what I imagine it is for Delirium. Your feet aren't the matter of worry. It's your shoulders. If the restraint doesn't go all the way down, you can't ride.
------------------
I was asked to describe X in one word. The word? -- OhmygoshwhathaveIgottenmyselfintothisisthescariest
thingintheworldhelpmeIamgoingtodieAHHHH!!!
I think the reason for the height restraint was a mixed logic between the danger of clipping your feet on a part of the ride (i.e. load pit, side supports) and the shoulder issue. Even though you can pull them down on your own, I do know that too tall shoulders can cause problems with the harnesses. Im just surprised we haven't seen this before on other rides, especially coasters. If the harness is going to cause problems on one ride, in theory, even with differences in style, that problem could crop up on other ride styles.
------------------
And Trogdor smote the Kerrek, and all was laid to Burnination.
-Strong Bad
Justin "I'll be miffed if I can't ride this thing" Adams
------------------
Never look a gift horse in the mouth, because horses have very bad breath
haux said:
That's what I imagine it is for Delirium. Your feet aren't the matter of worry. It's your shoulders. If the restraint doesn't go all the way down, you can't ride.
If that is the case, then they shouldnt have a max height restriction. Everyone's structure(body) is different.
I to cannot understand why recently we have max height restrictions on adult(or older kid's) attractions. From the 90's and earlier, this was never an issue on rollercoasters or flats.
------------------
Arena football has arrived in the Windy City. Go "Chicago Rush"
------------------
You can't fight in Here. This is the War room.
-Stanly Kubricks Dr. Strangelove Or how i learned how to stop worrying and love the bomb.
*** This post was edited by SFGAm Man 4/28/2003 11:21:17 PM ***
I say that, if course, because I'm 75 inches tall, but I can lose that inch in just a second of bad posture (-;
The bad thing is now we'll not only hear " I gotta lose some weight to go out coastering this summer" but also "My kid looks like he's getting kinda tall. Better stop feeding him til after the park trip."
You must be logged in to post