Delayed Windseeker Openings?

Friday, April 29, 2011 11:10 AM

Looks like Kings Island Windseeker will NOT be opened this weekend. Seeing where CP's version is at currently...I would probably guess they won't be open by their opening day either.

Seems strange that roller coasters are able to open almost right on time, but they aren't hitting this on opening day.

I do know Ohio just had their rainiest month since the age of man, but still...

+0
Saturday, April 30, 2011 9:23 PM

Anyone else notice that CP has now added work night work lights and are now working on it around the clock? Kudos for them to at least step it up a notch.

+0
Saturday, April 30, 2011 10:02 PM
TTD 120mph's avatar

I can see CP's opening on time if they continue this dedication.


-Adam G-

+0
Saturday, April 30, 2011 11:31 PM

I wonder what role, if anything, the big, last minute switch from Funtime to Mondial might have played in the delay?


My author website: mgrantroberts.com

+0
Saturday, April 30, 2011 11:59 PM
Jeff's avatar

Who said it was last minute, or that Funtime ever had a shot?


Jeff - Webmaster/Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog - Twitter - Video

+0
Sunday, May 1, 2011 12:16 AM

Funtime itself apparently believed they had an agreement with CF. And they did that whole, ill-advised retribution announcement in the third week of August, which (and I'm going out on limb here) seems pretty late in the process for the following season's attraction.


My author website: mgrantroberts.com

+0
Sunday, May 1, 2011 2:22 AM
Jeff's avatar

Oh yeah, I remember that. I don't think Cedar Fair ever had any contract with them, or that they ever changed their mind. For all of their faults, they're not really a last minute kind of company when it comes to major cap ex efforts like that.


Jeff - Webmaster/Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog - Twitter - Video

+0
Sunday, May 1, 2011 2:34 AM

Funny, we never did hear anything else about Funtime suing Cedar Fair. So either a law firm told them their claim was without merit, or it was shot down early in civil court. Or maybe it was all just bluster.


My author website: mgrantroberts.com

+0
Sunday, May 1, 2011 10:11 AM

I'm going with bluster. IMO, it was a way to justify, or legitimize, busting out CF's announcement before the date. Once that was done we never heard another word.

Can't we all just get along?

+0
Sunday, May 1, 2011 11:39 AM

Suing customers is always a risky proposition. What you gain in the short term you may more than lose in the long term from lost future business. And even if not from that particular customer, from other possible customers who as a general rule, don't like to give business to people who sue them.

+0

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums - ©2018, POP World Media, LLC
Loading...