That's kind of like saying, most teenagers don't see alcohol as impairing the ability to drive.
There are some things in this world that are simply obvious. These things don't require a certificate from Mensa or a degree from Caltech to realize.
Why are we apologizing for teenagers or people in general who break rules or break laws and then receive the consequences of their actions? No, i don't think the kid deserved to die or deserved to get injured, but there's no way to soften it. It's not the nature of teenagers. It's not the fact that there weren't warning signs covering every square inch of the two fences the kid scaled. It's not the layout of the coaster.
This is a horrible incident that shouldn't have happened and there's no way to explain it as being reasonable.
We're all saying "How could someone do that?" What do you want to bet the parents think "How could he do that" Get past the grief, shock, sadness, I bet you anything they are/will be as dumbfounded as we are by the action that lead to the death. *** Edited 6/29/2008 3:33:45 AM UTC by Peabody***
Peabody said:
^^Put us in our place? You're kidding, right?
Sadly, he's not.
It's one vehicle. Anyone with modest street-crossing experience should be able to avoid a single moving vehicle.
Just me?
I find it a little strange.
-Travis
www.youtube.com/TSVisits
What this kid did is no different then someone going out and getting trashed and wrapping themselves around a tree after there drunk butt decides to drive.
It sucks for the family yes, but it does not take away the total asinity of the whole thing.
TO use another example, It's not as if the kid wasn't paying attention and ran a stop sign, the kid ran the stop sign full well knowing it was there and doing it willingly. One is tragic, the other is just plain stupid.
-Brent Kneebush
What's the real cause? We won't know until details emerge, since it's the first day... witnesses will help tell the tale because friends at the scene may try to dictate otherwise. Was it a lost hat, or was he trying to take a short-cut, or was he trying to grab the coaster as it flew by?
Either way, we won't have to deal with him seeding the future of our children... and maybe our future won't be so much like Idiocracy if Darwinism has its way.
Now that that's out of my system... Yes, it is an unfortunate, terrible thing to happen. I feel sorry for the kid's family and friends, the people who witnessed it, the emergency people who responded (what a horrible thing for them to see) and even the park.
Why should they be subject to all the questions and scrutiny, when any sensible person can see they took every reasonable precaution to keep people out of dangerous areas? Out of tens of millions of visitors to theme parks across the country this year, we have 2 who don't understanding what "danger" and "keep out" mean.
If the story about the shortcut is true, there's probably another rule the kids broke. Probably the church group or chaperones wouldn't even think to tell teenagers to stay in the park it's such a no-brainer. Besides, wouldn't most groups have some provision for some kind of food service arranged? What reason would these kids have to leave the park?
Now is Markey going to demand 18' high concrete walls and a moat around every ride? Are we going to hear about how evil parks are because they only put up 6' high fences instead of 8' because they don't want to spend the extra money to keep customers safe?
What other rules and devices will be implemented in parks as a result of this accident? And how much will it cost us parkgoers? Am I being selfish and uncaring here? Damn right. Frankly I'm sick and tired of all our time and money that's been wasted in the cause of trying to make the world idiot-proof for people who can't or won't be responsible for themselves.
I don't think anyone is saying that it's not sad that someone DIED. It's always sad when a person dies, especially a young one, but it just blows my mind (and apparently many of the other people on this site) that someone could have such a blatant disregard for park safety regulations all for a stupid hat (or a shortcut for that matter).
I HAVE noticed that it seems as if the people who sue are typically the ones who don't deserve the settlement they get (and I am in NO WAY saying the girl from KK didn't deserve a large settlement because she definitely DID), but the ones who actually have a case don't bother. If you think about it, I believe half these deserving victims don't sue because they've seen what happens to others that sue and deserve a settlement and don't get it. Take, for example, the man who had an operation and the docs left a 14 inch retractor blade in his abdomen. He only won $200,000 from the hospital. The retractor caused irreparable scarring from all the surgeries he had to have to remove the blade and to excise infection. Then he had a huge hole permanently in his stomach from all the infection that couldn't be healed, and now he's dying as a result of all this (actually, this happened a while ago, so he's probably dead). Yet the hot coffee lady from McDonalds got millions. This is the world we live in. Shame, right?
The sad part in terms of Six Flags is that even though Six Flags isn't to blame for this, people WILL remain wary and could see this as another reason to not visit Six Flags.
"Look at us spinning out in the madness of a roller coaster" - Dave Matthews Band
I think RatherGoodBear also pointed out exactly the case lawyers will bring. "He only had to climb a 6 foot fence. There should be more of a barrier, blah blah blah." I think most reasonable people would feel that crossing 2 fences would negate the responsibility of SF but in today's court systems and judges, it's scary to think...
Although we don't know the whole story, something seems weird about the re-entry theory. From what I remember being at the park, Batman butts up right against the parking lot and there was a lot more than just a 6 foot fence, maybe I'm wrong.
I don't believe, nor do I think that anyone else here believes, that the park is responsible with the info we have been given so far. Except for adding the little thing about STOP at KK, the media hasn't been negative towards SF with regards to this story. I really can't see it going that way unless some new news is revealed that would incriminate the park.
-Travis
www.youtube.com/TSVisits
bucknut08 said:
Although we don't know the whole story, something seems weird about the re-entry theory. From what I remember being at the park, Batman butts up right against the parking lot and there was a lot more than just a 6 foot fence, maybe I'm wrong.
You know what? Teens do stupid things. Maybe the vast majority don't choose playing chicken with a roller coaster for their particular brand of stupidity, but a lot of them find some way or another to be idiots. I can remember all sorts of crap I got into at that age that, if my parents had known, would have caused them to immediately lock me in my bedroom until I was 25. They think they're immortal, that they're gods walking the planet. It comes from having an incompletely developed frontal cortex until reaching the mid-twenties. it comes from peer pressure, from tradition, from inexperience... from I don't know what.
My author website: mgrantroberts.com
Does that fence look WAY to low to you all? Even though a kid should know better, it should be at least tall enough to make it seem not worth the effort to climb, imo.
-Travis
www.youtube.com/TSVisits
LostKause said:I really wish the kid's parents would get a CoasterBuzz account so they could put you all in your place.
I'm sure that's pretty high on their list of priorities right now. Look for them to be coming around any minute.
Regardless of the lack of blame on SF (at this point at least), this certainly won't help their rep in the eyes of the general public. Pretty soon you'll have a choice on what to buy with your five dollars; a 20 oz. Coke from a park vending machine or eighteen shares of SF stock.
You must be logged in to post