Anyway, I'd say it's the smaller parks that are going to affect things, not SF. More and more people will visit those parks next year and thereafter until SF learns that people want more out of a park than million-dollar rides.
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
Adam
Six Flags has the capacity to effect change in the relationship between ride manufacturers and park chains. There, that wasn't so hard! ;)
Adam, I certainly believe that making good rides, and marketing them "effectively", can keep a business going even without SF. But, as SF has picked up the lion's share of US markets, it certainly *behooves* manufacturers to actively court SF's business as well.
Seriously, SF has purchased most of what they need ride wise, and will do some "filling in" over the next decade or so, but the parks in Europe still have SOME active growth left and Asia is virtually untapped outside of Japan. With the world economy rebounding in '04-'05, I would expect to see more parks going up in Eastern Europe (Transylvania perhaps, LOL) and especially Southeast Asia....the new global economy ROCKS!!
You still have Zoidberg.... You ALL have Zoidberg! (V) (;,,;) (V)
/striving for off-topicness
Usually "effect" is a noun... i.e. What are the effects of riding SoB 94 times in a row? Riding SoB that many times really could affect your spine.
bill, causing English teachers to pull their hair out since 1967...:)
You still have Zoidberg.... You ALL have Zoidberg! (V) (;,,;) (V)
Thanks,
DMC
You make me proud. :)
Colin "the out-of-work copyeditor" D.
*** Six Flags' troubles (and if by that you mean not installing a slew of coasters for once) may have little effect other than forcing the company to bolster things like infrastructure and guest relations. It could be the best thing to happen to Six Flags and the worst thing to happen to its competitors. The glass doesn't have to be half-empty.
You must be logged in to post