Does anyone know if the switchbacks are there, or would queing have to be installed as well?
They could hook up the 3rd tower, but it'd be a lot of work.
*** Edited 2/18/2004 8:05:47 PM UTC by rOLLocOASt***
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
Although for marketing reasons, if they did decide to use the third tower, I think that they would need something different than the other two towers. If one tower shoots up and the other shoots down, maybe the third tower can use one of S&S's new tilting seat options.
Developed by S&S Sports Power, Inc., Logan, Utah, the three-column structure will house two gravity-defying rides, one launching passengers from ground level straight into the air, the other blasting riders down from 17 stories high at faster than free-fall speeds; a third column will serve as a support structure.
About making the third leg functional, I think that would involve too much effort. I think they'd have to completely disassemble the tower just to get the large air cylinders inside of the column. If they could find a way to do that, they'd still have to install all of the control systems, actual mechanical parts, and such...all of which would have to be purchased seperately from S&S. I really don't think it'd be worth the work and cash, but that's just my opinion.
Perhaps the 3rd leg could be a "double shot."
mantis man said:
About making the third leg functional...
Heh Heh ... my third leg is perfectly functional thank you very much ... and no input from S&S!!
Sorry, had to say it ;)
But on a serious note, I was curious why the third tower didn't have a car on it. I figured it was just down for maintenance or something. It doesn't seem like it'd be all that complicated to get the compressors in the tower - just take off the top? Isn't the thing hollow inside?
As far as reopening the 3rd tower, my guess is as good as anybody elses. But I do agree, it would cost a LOT of money to get all the necessary components installed IF they could do it.
I've seen S&S press releases that state the 3rd tower was installed in case the park decides they need a higher-capacity attraction.
I believe the ride at Lagoon has the same arrangement, as well as a few others.
VolcanoTBC said:
The third tower on Dominator was definitely built as an option to increase capacity in the future if so desired. It's so obviously NOT a structural feature. S&S built a 2-tower complex at Worlds of Fun, so there's no need to just randomly build a third tower and not use it.I've seen S&S press releases that state the 3rd tower was installed in case the park decides they need a higher-capacity attraction.
I believe the ride at Lagoon has the same arrangement, as well as a few others.
The Rocket at Lagoon was built to have a 3rd Operating Tower. It opened with 3 Compressors (1 for each tower) and all of the Compressed Air Lines, Storage Tanks, Shot Tanks, and Electrical Conduit in Place. From what I know, Lagoon wanted to install the First 185ft Double Shot on the 3rd Tower, but we'll see what happens in the Future.
Of course, I rarely hit the park on the weekends. But the last two seasons, the line was only more than 5 or 6 cycles a handful of times when I was there.
Neat rumor and it sounds like it could be done, but my first thought is "why bother?"
You must be logged in to post