This is the only big park in the country lacking a waterpark. While I am sure that SFGAm will always sustain attendance figures between 2-3 mil, the addition of a waterpark would further maintain those figures and even keep them near the 3 mil figure.
PGA IMO did the right thing with installing Boomerang Bay for the 2004 season. SFGAm could easily get rid of Ice Mountain Splash and do the same thing.
The better option for a waterpark would be in the current bus parking lot. They could start small and be able to expand on it in the future.
Its late and I am rambling but oh well. :)
My favorite MJ tune: "Billie Jean" which I have been listening to alot now. RIP MJ.
Oh, and waterparks are THE single most profitable venture a park can undertake...considering the cost of rides, it's almost like FREE money...;)
You still have Zoidberg.... You ALL have Zoidberg! (V) (;,,;) (V)
Let's trade parks for a year and then you can tell me who has a raw deal.
mOOSH [would gladly trade all of SFMM's coasters for SFDL's Superman]
Isn't Reverchon the manuafacture of the spinning wild mouse that the girl was killed on at Lightwater Valley? Does anyone know if the fault of that accident was the park's or the manufacturer's? *** Edited 1/12/2004 6:36:03 PM UTC by super7***
Anyone know where in the park they are placing it? I would think it would fit best themematically in Country Fair but seeing that there is not much room back there and its Six Flags I doubt it goes there.
2022 Trips: WDW, Sea World San Diego & Orlando, CP, KI, BGW, Bay Beach, Canobie Lake, Universal Orlando
-Nate
super7 said:
Better no waterpark than losing rides like Great America in CA did at the price of a waterpark in my opinion.........nice that they are getting a package like that to make up for some of the recent year's removals.
If SFGAm went the same route as PGA is doing with a waterpark, we would only lose Ice Mountain Splash (AKA Yankee Clipper). This is a water ride that barely operates. We would possibly lose some of the picnic grove but considering how big the grove is, it wouldn't matter to lose some of it.
If they chose to build one in the bus parking lot, we wouldn't lose anything. :)
My favorite MJ tune: "Billie Jean" which I have been listening to alot now. RIP MJ.
This was probably one of the easiest secrets to keep becuase GAm probably knew that track and supports and everything else would not arrive until end of Jan. beginning of February. It would only take them until March or so to complete it.
My idea for a location would be the are where the rock walls are too, or the area between STT and SSA. Obviously, they would have to go and extend into the parking lot, but that's what I think.
A water Park is Just what SFGAm needs to take people out of the midways and make room for....more people. Maybe one day, then I'll think about going back(okay, it wouldn't take alot to get me back, so nevermind that:)).
TeknoScorpion said:
With reasoning like that, then you don't think SFMM or any of the other big Six Flags parks(all of which have water parks) should have went in? Even Disney has a couple water Parks, and there are 4 theme parks there.
What I mean is it cost $20,000,000 for a very SMALL LOW CAPACITY park, and Six Flags doesn't have the money anymore to put in very large water parks, there is no way they could even build a small one. I never said waterparks in general, just small water parks.
You must be logged in to post