I have no design experience, I can only make pages using wizards or Netscape something, and it irritates me some of the stuff I do see. What I was talking of was how on the info for the coasters on rcdb.com, I've seen way too many people copy the descriptions. If I look at a coaster on a person's site and it says, "the swooping drop does not qualify as an inversion, it doesn't meet this sites requirements", they haven't done a very good job. I like peoples' homepage/photo albums much better than these sites that change a few names, add prefixes, and copy the headlines of good sites. Not to mention, I was bored last night, and I wish I hadn't checked into some new sites that I did, most are poorly designed and load slow; fanpages, I saw some new ones I was impressed with, IMO. Non-member driven portal, I can't figure that out guys, I'm not trying to sound like I'm picking or something, I really can't figure up how that's supposed to work.