Posted
While Cedar Point considers building a year-round waterpark, representatives from The Beach Waterpark and Paramount's Kings Island, both located in Mason, Ohio, are not too concerned about the potential in-state competition. They say these are largely regional attractions.
Read more from The Cincinnati Enquirer.
Couldn't agree more....as regional as amusement parks are (and they ARE), waterparks are 5X moreso in my experience...no one makes a long drive to a waterpark, just doesn't happen. If CP goes ahead with their plan, my prediction for Cincy area waterparks is that they would be TOTALLY unaffected!
P.S. Part of my *job* is to make predictions...;)
------------------
your company's name and logo HERE...effective advertising at great rates!
"I think it's going to be a benefit of going to Cedar Point. I don't think anyone's going to go up there just because of a water park."
Right - and no one goes to Great Bear Lodge just because of a water park. They must be there to visit Meijer. And I'm sure no one will go to the monster-sized Kalahari Resort that is headed to the area.
That's the point - these places are meant to be destinations.
While I'm sure water parks are regional, Sandusky might eventually become the exception to the rule. The comparisons to the Wisconsin Dells have already started.
------------------
Walt Schmidt - Virtual Midway
*** This post was edited by Gemini 7/28/2003 11:28:39 AM ***
But you miss one thing in your comparison to the Dells. Waterparks were added far after the Dells became popular. I don't have exact dates, but I know the Dells became popular in the late 40's / early 50's. In fact, the first "Duck" vehicle was purchased in 1946 for use in the Dells. http://www.dellsducks.com/history.html
And from another website we can see that the first waterpark was opened in 1979 - Noah's Ark. http://www.wisdells.com/community/timeline.htm
The Dells' main draw has become water themed enjoyment because that brings repeat visitors - not the beautiful landscape - which once drew people to this part of Wisconsin. Try to tell me, convincingly, that people will go to Sandusky for the local/hotel water parks over visiting CP...
While I can see the waterpark resorts coming to Sandusky, they will not eclipse CP. They will fight amongst themselves for the tourist hotel dollars, but they will not make a market unto themselves, like has occurred in the Dells.
------------------
--George H
---Currency tracking experiment... http://www.wheresgeorge.com (Referring to The "George" on the $1 bill - Not Me)
*** This post was edited by redman822 7/28/2003 12:22:45 PM ***
The reason Cedar Point is considering the Radisson expansion is to build business outside of the "summer operating season." That's the whole point.
"People will not go to Sandusky solely because a hotel has a water park"
Believe it or not, it happens all year. The tremendous success of Great Bear has already proven that indoor water parks can be a destination. With only one indoor park, it may not be as noticeable, but the notion that Sandusky is dead during the winter is turning around.
------------------
Walt Schmidt - Virtual Midway
*** This post was edited by Gemini 7/28/2003 1:09:41 PM ***
Cedar Point isn't doing this because it will help during the summer. The Radisson is largely booked solid during the summer. They are doing this to increase overnight stays in the winter and shoulder seasons.
Nobody is expecting these waterparks to eclipse Cedar Point. Most of the attractions that were built in Orlando weren't built to eclipse Disney World. They want to feed off the frenzy.
Sandusky dies during the winter. I should know, I was a resident. If Cedar Point can bring in more tourist dollars during the winter then that would justify a tax incentive from the City. It would be good for the City, the mall, the local theaters, etc.
I wouldn't be surprised if Cedar Point's wasn't the last indoor waterpark to be built. The people with vision were the folks from Great Bear Lodge. They look like geniuses now.*** This post was edited by wahoo skipper 7/28/2003 1:11:38 PM ***
But I think the impact of this expansion on the Summertime business of the Cincinnati-area waterparks, that will be *minimal* at most...
------------------
your company's name and logo HERE...effective advertising at great rates!
The Beach and PKI are not concerned/worried about the year-round waterparks in Sandusky because DURING THE SUMMER operating season they don't forsee people driving out of their parking lots to go to Sandusky instead.
When these parks will make their impact, presumably, would be during the off-season when PKI, The Beach, and CP are closed.
Again, as I stated in my pevious post, the Dells have become known for their waterparks, over their original draw - the local scenery. I do not forsee Sandusky being known for their waterparks over their original draw - Cedar Point.
------------------
--George H
---Currency tracking experiment... http://www.wheresgeorge.com (Referring to The "George" on the $1 bill - Not Me)
Bob
------------------
Walt Schmidt - Virtual Midway
The point of this article is that PKI and The Beach are not concerned about the waterpark that CP wants to build at Radisson.
They already take into consideration that CP will draw some people from their area (as they do from as far away as Chicago, too). THe crux of it is that they don't believe that the addition of year round waterpark(s) in the Sandusky area will cut into their customer base which is, for the most part, day visitors.
------------------
--George H
---Currency tracking experiment... http://www.wheresgeorge.com (Referring to The "George" on the $1 bill - Not Me)
I understand the point of the article and I don't disagree with it. The only part I disagreed with was the quote, "I don't think anyone's going to go up there just because of a water park." That's just not an accurate statement. Otherwise, you wouldn't see LMN and Cedar Fair getting into that market.
------------------
Walt Schmidt - Virtual Midway
------------------
Everybody needs a good BM...WHAT!!?!?!
Visit me at http://www.freewebs.com/behemothrct
Either way, it boild down to how comments can be taken out of context/inferring the meaning of what was said. You took it as "Who would go up there in the winter" and I took it as "I don't think anyone is going to go to Sandusky in the summerjust because of a water park with Cedar Point in the vicinity."
------------------
--George H
---Currency tracking experiment... http://www.wheresgeorge.com (Referring to The "George" on the $1 bill - Not Me)
Now i CAN see this development hurting the summertime attendance at the Cinti parks IF these parks are built and the area gets the reputation of the place to be for water parks. The other thought is, if this area is looking for more types of gate attractions; wouldn't it stand to reason that if these parks add to the drawing power of Sandusky for summer/winter destinations, that another park company would see the opportunity and open a seasonal gate in Erie County? Wouldn't a Sea World, Universal or Disney work well in the area? I think so. Having two parks in the same neighborhood would only bring more people every summer. It seems to me that the amusement industry thrives on nodes of activities. The more stuff and places to do in a certain area, the more likly people will be willing to travel long distances to get there.
Chuck
------------------
Charles Nungester.
It's official Lesourdsville Lake is closed for 2003
And you'll get the famalies that say "We were gonna head to PKI this year for a change but we definetly want a water park and CP has a new one, so we'll just make it 1 big trip"
------------------
-Troy
EHT (Extended Hangtime) Survivor - Cbuzz Con '03
Chance Rides - Leave it to Chance
You must be logged in to post