1) World's scariest chair-- Insanity @ Stratosphere
2) Tallest and fastest -- TTD @ CP
3) Oldest Theme Park-- Lake Compounce
4) Largest Ferris Wheel-- Fair Park, Dallas
5) Largest Seaside Park-- Morey's
6) First Floorless in SoCal-- Scream @ SFMM
7) Largest U.S. Water Park-- Noah's Ark
8) Tallest Woodie-- SOB @ PKI
9) South's Loopiest Coaster-- Assimilator @ Carowinds
10) Highest Drop-- Drop Zone Stunt @ PKD
They never say what their criteria are for deciding the best of anything. Now whether having the fallest, tallest, biggest anything means the whole park it's in should be ranked in the Top 10 is a matter of discussion. And that's why we're here.
I think an amusement park (used as a generic term encompassing amusement parks, theme parks and whatnot) is simply a collection of rides placed in the same area where admission or fees are paid to ride those rides and those rides are the sole attraction.
Under that definition, the roof of the Stratosphere certainly qualifies as an amusement park. They have four rides grouped together that you pay to access and there's no other reason for guests to be on the roof other than to visit/use those rides.
Heck, I'd certainly call the Adventuredome at Circus Circus an amusement park, although in comparison to the Stratosphere it's technically it's just some rides stuck behind the casino/hotel.
The real question in that definition comes in the number of rides, I suppose. Is 4 rides enough to make an 'amusement park'? If not, what arbitrary number does it take to make a collection of rides into an 'amusement park'.
(In hindsight, I suppose you could also argue the presence of other park staples like games and food also matter)
Just some ideas. Feel free to rip apart my theories - I'm new to this whole 'need to classify' thing. ;)
razore86 said:
I don't understand how a park like "Fair Park" ranked higher than say.... Kennywood? Who has even heard of FP?
Fair Park is taking about the State Fair of Texas. It's not a real park for 11 months of the year, and is one of the best flat ride parks for 1 month a year. :)
The main difference between our list and the ones on AOL and MSN are that it's not any of our jobs to make the list that gets posted to those sites.
In the end it's just the opinion of the person whose job it was to make a list in arbitrary categories of their own choosing. Not every list is meant to be an authority or even proclaims to be.
(man, things are getting really anal around here lately :) )
That is, assuming you feel the need to classify ;)
RavenTTD said:LOL AstroLand! That place totally sucked. Astroworld is the best amusement park.
You obviously haven't ridden their Top Spin (3.8mb). Of course, that doesn't make it a number one. The makers of the list have probably never even visited the parks, they just researched who has the tallest, fastest, biggest, yadda yadda yadda of whatever to come up with a list just as people are starting to make summer plans.
*** Edited 5/14/2005 12:32:17 AM UTC by Cyclonic***
a permanent collection of rides placed in the same area where admission or fees are paid to ride those rides and those rides are the sole attraction
So, exaclty how many rides does it take to be a park? I could have a train ride in my backyard and charge people to ride it. It's permanent and I charge and it's the sole attraction. Amusement park or not? I'm not trying to start an arguement, however, I don't think it's as cut and dry as some say. *** Edited 5/14/2005 3:18:29 PM UTC by Coasterbuzzer***
What would have to be added?
*** Edited 5/14/2005 3:24:05 PM UTC by Lord Gonchar***
The 'need to classify' rules the enthusiast community with a mind warping iron fist.
What's an inversion? What's an Amusement Park? What's a Theme Park? Who Has This or That? Biggest, Fastest, Longest, Newest, Most Unique, Whatever?
Why do enthusiasts have to categorize on such a meticulous level?
You must be logged in to post