I mean, right now Wild Thing is our baby. Excalibur is great, and on the days when the trims aren't heavy on High Roller is a great wooden coaster. However, if Cedar Fair would give Valleyfair as much attention as it does dorney and plop down an invert I promise not to complain about the lack of attention from the chain for another four years.
I realize this promise really doesn't me jack squat, as Valleyfair isn't going to make any decisions because a fanboy says he won't complain for x amount of years. But its nice to dream.
In all honesty I think out of all of the chain's parks Worlds of Fun is currently the most attention deprived park. To all of those in the KC area, I feel for ya man/mam
-----------------
"Ooo. They have the Internet on computers now."
-Homer Simpson
*** This post was edited by DWeaver on 10/10/2001. ***
-----------------
Jeff - Webmaster/Admin - CoasterBuzz.com
"From the global village... in the age of communication!"
Watch the grass grow!
-----------------
"Ooo. They have the Internet on computers now."
-Homer Simpson
-----------------
Drive to theme parks for the food, stay for the coasters!! Knott's Fried Chicken
Sure, but could said parks recover the cost? Millennium Force paid for itself in the form of more visitors, which includes not only the admission but the in-park spending. Add to that it attracted enough attention book a new hotel most of the season.
Incidentalist said:
"For the amount of money that CP spent on MF, they could build several high quality rides at one of their other parks or even build one coaster in each of their othe parks."
Remember, Cedar Fair tends to treat its parks as individual business units, so they only spend what they can make back short-term. Six Flags doesn't do things that way in most cases, but to their credit much of their capital has been poured into smaller regional parks to give people an incentive to go period. Parks like Valleyfair have a nice collection to attract people, so it makes little sense to build some giant ride there every two or three years.
-------------
Jeff - Webmaster/Admin - CoasterBuzz.com
"From the global village... in the age of communication!"
Watch the grass grow!
You missed my point, and I think I could have been more clear with it. I was in no way stating that Cedar Fair should pour money into each of their parks at an equal rate. And I'm not saying that VF should get a huge coaster. I was saying that they (Valley Fair patrons) are only asking for a coaster, not the most expensive coaster ever built. While VF couldn't bring in enough revenue to justify a $20 million plus ride, what about a $3 million CCI or >$10 million beemer. If Silver Dollar City can spend the money for a nice Beemer and it's located in the middle of nowhere (I'm from MO, so I know), why can't decent sized parks in metro areas. Heck, SDC has added more coasters to their park then VF (I think) over the last decade. VF doesn't deserve a big piece of the Cedar Fair pie, but they should get a sliver and lately that hasn't been the case. Same thing for WoF (oooh, a Boomerang, but they lost the Zinger). The only reason I get worked up about things like this is when someone who is a regular to a small, neglected park wants something new everyone throws the ROI theory at them and says just wait. But at the same time there are numerous CP and SFMM patrons that demand something new every year. It gets old.
And lastly, are you saying that a $25 million investment in one park (CP) can draw in more revenue then if that investment was placed into four parks (KBF, VF, WoF and Dorney)? I don't advocate that theory, but I believe more money would lie in the latter.
*** This post was edited by Incidentalist on 10/11/2001. ***
A new ride can justify the resorts increasing room rates which quickly leads to a major impact on the bottom line. Also, CP does more group business than any of the other four parks and groups will sign on the line more quickly with a popular new ride on the horizon.
Bottom line, CP is the cash cow and should be invested in as such. However, incendentalist, I understand your rationaliation now that you explained it more.
Jeff Said: It sounds like you're in line for something big?
I'm hopeing for the rumors to come true for Valleyfair to get its own inverted coaster for the 2002 season. I have been doing some surfing around the web saying that B&M has plans four coasters for parks around the US. Is Cedar Fair ready for annoucements coming up sometime soon? Long time worker at Valleyfair.
*** This post was edited by The Beast on 10/11/2001. ***
My advice is to not get your hopes up for an invert to high as current speculation is that it won't be until 2003 or 2004 until we (Valleyfair) get a coaster. This isn't to say VF won't get a flat ride or two this year. This is also not to say that speculation is right, and Valleyfair could in fact have parts being made as we speak for a 2002 B&M inverted named Falcon.
If we get something we (fellow VF fans) should make sure we post construction updates and nice lil posts to encourage people in making a trip to the state with 10,000 lakes.
-----------------
"Ooo. They have the Internet on computers now."
-Homer Simpson
You must be logged in to post