Posted
Anti-gambling forces will attack the college tuition promises of the electronic-slots proposal on the November ballot, in hopes of tainting the issue's strongest selling point. Vote No Casinos unveiled its strategy Tuesday, the same day slots backers learned that their bid to bring 31,500 slot machines to Ohio has been certified for the Nov. 7 ballot. The Plain Dealer reports that Cedar Fair has contributed to Vote No Casinos.
Read more from The Plain Dealer.
Link: PointBuzz
In general, I enjoy gambling, but not enough to go down to that hole. I can wait until the next time I go to Vegas.
Im voting FOR the slot machines myself...
*** This post was edited by SteveWoA 9/20/2006 3:46:23 PM ***
Out of all the gambling licenses that are issued in the state of Illinois, (9 being used and 1 that continues to be in limbo), I never once heard of places like SFGAm even sticking their head in any debates or discussion of such licenses.
In Fact Argosy of Indiana sucessfully lobbied the state of Ohio to keep SW Ohio from being included in the Gambling bill to begin with.
Friggin Politicians and lobbiest. See my signature in the forum.
Seems to me that gaming and gambling would be one of the easiest industries in which you could "under-report" your income. Some of the AC casinos have never reported a profit in over 20 years of operation.
Any guesses as to what happened next? ;)
Unlike other states with actual casinos, Illinois has benefited from them since they were made legal. Just the city of Elgin which has one of the boats, has enjoyed great downtown redevelopment and new businesses. It does make a difference if the right government officials are using the money wisely.
Seems to me that gaming and gambling would be one of the easiest industries in which you could "under-report" your income. Some of the AC casinos have never reported a profit in over 20 years of operation.))))))
And your not in the slums two blocks out of CP? try the end of the causway :) LOL
Gambling in Indiana is doing hit and miss. One is for sale but will probably close and many others and the cities around them are doing well as well.
I oppose Ohios as written as it makes only those already with gambling buisness in the state the sole propriitors if aproved. THE HORSE TRACKS.
Show enough money in the politicians swiss bank acount and you can get anything done.
Time to demand they don't take it and show they won't be there long if they do. Thats the only way PEOPLE can take back control of THEIR INTEREST and not big money's.
I have absolutely nothing against gambling even though it doesn't and never has interested me. Heck, I didn't even gamble the last time I was in Vegas. :) It's one of those personal issues that the government has no right sticking it's nose into. Why would it be anyone's business if I gambled anyway? :)
But just like booze/drug addiction or any kind of addiction, you really have nobody to blame but yourself if it messes up your life. There IS help available if you want it. Sometimes I think West Virginia should get off their holy roller soapbox and build some real casinos. I am sure the state could use the money and tourism.
-Tina*** This post was edited by coasterqueenTRN 9/24/2006 3:01:11 PM ***
You must be logged in to post