Posted Tuesday, November 2, 2010 11:59 AM | Contributed by Jeff
[Ed. note: The following is an unedited, but partial, press release. -J]
Cedar Fair Entertainment Company (NYSE: FUN), a leader in regional amusement parks, water parks and active entertainment, today announced results for the third quarter ended September 26, 2010, and provided attendance and revenue trends through October. (Note: the Company also announced executive promotions as part of its ongoing leadership succession planning process.)
Net revenues for the nine-month period increased $37.4 million to $847.9 million from $810.5 million on 40 fewer operating days in 2010. Net income for this same period totaled $31.6 million, or $0.57 per diluted limited partner unit, compared with net income of $61.7 million, or $1.10 per diluted limited partner unit, for the nine months ended September 27, 2009. Adjusted EBITDA, which management believes is a meaningful measure of the Company's park-level operating results, increased $30.3 million to $339.3 million for the nine months ended September 26, 2010, compared with $309.0 million during the same period last year. The increase in adjusted EBITDA is primarily attributable to an increase in attendance and out-of-park revenues combined with relatively flat operating expenses. See the attached table for a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income.
“Through the end of the third quarter, our parks entertained 19.8 million visitors, an increase of 6 percent - or approximately 1 million more visitors than this time last year,” said Dick Kinzel, Cedar Fair's chairman, president and chief executive officer. “During this same period out-of-park revenues were up 7 percent, or approximately $6 million, to $92.2 million while average in-park guest per capita spending was down slightly at $39.35, a decrease of approximately 1 percent.”
The Company reported strong increases in revenues in all regions, thanks in large part to innovative marketing, continual capital investment in the parks and favorable weather. Revenues increased in the southern and western regions due to higher attendance, slightly offset by a decrease in average in-park guest per capita spending. Revenues also improved in the northern region due to an increase in average in-park guest per capita spending coupled with improved attendance trends and out-of-park revenues.
“We experienced a significant improvement in season pass visits and group visits when compared with 2009,” added Kinzel. “The increase in visits by season passholders is due to an increase in the number of passes sold, particularly in our southern and western regions. In addition, attendance through the first nine months benefited from an increase in group sales business as many of our parks saw the return of numerous group bookings that did not occur in 2009.”
For the first nine months, operating costs and expenses increased $8.4 million, to $522.8 million for the period ended September 26, 2010, versus $514.4 million for the period ended September 27, 2009. This increase reflects $10.5 million of costs incurred in connection with the terminated Apollo merger and an increase in scheduled maintenance expense across the parks of approximately $6.0 million during the nine-month period. Reflected in the 2009 nine-month results was a $9.5 million settlement of a California class-action lawsuit and a $2.0 million settlement of a licensing dispute with Paramount Pictures. After depreciation, amortization and all other non-cash costs, operating income for the 2010 first nine months was $211.8 million compared with $205.4 million in 2009.
In July 2010, the Company completed a refinancing of its outstanding debt by issuing $405.0 million of 9.125% senior unsecured notes and entering into a new $1,435.0 million credit agreement, resulting in the recognition of a $35.3 million loss during the period on the early extinguishment of its previously existing debt. As a result of the 2010 refinancing, as well as the August 2009 amend and extend of $900.0 million of term debt, interest-rate spreads were higher for the first nine months of 2010 than the same period a year ago. Based on the higher interest-rate spreads, interest expense for the nine months ended September 26, 2010, increased $12.9 million to $103.9 million.
A provision for taxes of $37.4 million was recorded to account for publicly traded partnership taxes and the tax attributes of the Company's corporate subsidiaries during the first nine months of 2010, compared with a provision for taxes of $48.3 million in the same period a year ago.
After interest expense, loss on early extinguishment of debt, a $12.9 million non-cash charge to income for the net effect of swaps, the provision for taxes, $8.2 million in unrealized/realized foreign currency gains, and other income, the net income for the first nine months of 2010 totaled $31.6 million, or $0.57 per diluted limited partner unit, compared with net income of $61.7 million, or $1.10 per unit in 2009.
Cedar Fair generated net revenues of $545.0 million in the third quarter of 2010 and net income of $75.7 million, or $1.36 per diluted limited partner unit. For the same period last year, the Company reported net revenues of $519.9 million and net income of $107.6 million, or $1.92 per diluted limited partner unit. During the third quarter of 2010, the Company recognized a loss of $35.3 million for the early extinguishment of debt due to the previously announced debt refinancing.
For the third quarter, adjusted EBITDA increased $22.8 million, or 8 percent, to $299.7 million from $276.9 million in 2009. This increase in adjusted EBITDA was attributable to the increase in revenues, which was driven by attendance gains in season pass visits and group-sales business and improved occupancy at our resort hotels, as well as the decline in operating costs and expenses in the period.
“Our strong growth in the third quarter is further evidence of the meaningful momentum we continue to build for Cedar Fair,” said Kinzel. “During the quarter, thanks in large part to our innovative marketing plans and new rides and attractions, we were able to increase attendance by approximately 5 percent, or 547,000 visitors, compared with a year ago, with out-of-park revenues increasing approximately 10 percent, or $4.7 million.”
Kinzel noted that the average in-park guest per capita spending remained essentially unchanged during the quarter.
Performance Remains Very Strong in October Based on preliminary October results, revenues for the first ten months of the year were $974 million compared with $914 million for the same period a year ago. This is a result of an 8 percent, or 1.6 million-visit, increase in attendance to 22.2 million visitors compared with 20.6 million in 2009, a decrease of approximately 1 percent in average in-park guest per capita spending to approximately $39.30, and an increase in out-of-park revenues of $6 million to approximately $101 million, due to increases in hotel occupancy.
For the month of October, revenues were up 25 percent, or approximately $21 million. This improvement during our fall events was largely due to a 29% increase in attendance and an approximate $300,000, or 3 percent, increase in out-of-park revenues. For the same period, average in-park guest per capita spending was down roughly one percent to last year.
“The strength of our fall events continues to draw more and more visitors each year,” added Kinzel. “A strong marketing program, continual investment in the fall events and favorable weather conditions in the northern and southern regions contributed to our strong results.”
Cash and Liquidity
As of September 26, 2010, the Company had $1.175 billion of variable-rate term debt, $405 million of fixed-rate debt (before original issue discounts), no outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facilities, and cash on hand of $61.7 million. Of the term debt outstanding at the end of the third quarter, $11.8 million is scheduled to mature within the next 12 months. The Company's credit facilities and cash flow from operations are expected to be sufficient to meet working capital needs, debt service, planned capital expenditures and distributions for the foreseeable future.
Peter Crage, executive vice president finance and chief financial officer, said, “In terms of both liquidity and cash flow, we are comfortable with where we ended the third quarter of 2010. Throughout the year, we have remained vigilant in our strict controls over operating costs while ensuring a 'best-in-class' visitor experience. This prudent fiscal policy, coupled with the recent refinancing provides us with the flexibility to create value for our unitholders through a combination of EBITDA and cash flow growth, distributions and a reduction in debt.”
Crage reiterated the Company's previously announced plan to pay a distribution of $0.25 per limited partner unit on December 15, 2010, to holders of record on December 3, 2010. This will represent the 24th consecutive year in which Cedar Fair has paid a distribution to its unitholders.
“As we head into the final quarter of 2010, we feel very good about our near-term outlook and long-range potential,” said Kinzel. “Based on our performance to date and our expectations through the end of the year, we now expect to achieve full-year revenues between $965 million and $980 million and adjusted EBITDA between $345 million and $355 million.”
This is an update from the guidance issued on October 5, 2010, when the Company reiterated its initial annual guidance for revenues of $940 million to $965 million, and adjusted EBITDA between $320 million and $340 million.
“These results provide an even stronger base from which we can execute on the long-term plan we outlined for you in early October,” added Kinzel. “We are very excited and even more confident now that we will be able to grow our profitability while steadily increasing the distribution and strengthening the balance sheet. Based on these results, I am pleased to announce we will return to quarterly distributions beginning next year. The Board intends to pay $20 million of distributions in 2011, which is approximately $0.35 per limited partner unit. The quarterly distribution would begin with an $0.08 per limited partner unit distribution in March of 2011. We believe the return of a quarterly distribution properly reflects our financial stability and further demonstrates our confidence in the future of Cedar Fair.”
Subject to further authorization of the board of directors, the Company plans to pay a quarterly cash distribution on each of March 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15, 2011, to unitholders of record at the close of business on March 3, June 3, September 5 and December 5, 2011, respectively.
Read the entire press release from Cedar Fair.
For the month of October, revenues were up 25 percent, or approximately $21 million. This improvement during our fall events was largely due to a 29% increase in attendance and an approximate $300,000, or 3 percent, increase in out-of-park revenues. For the same period, average in-park guest per capita spending was down roughly one percent to last year
This is why that gate needs bumped up a couple of bucks.
If you read between the lines, profit is actually down. I love the way they bury that.
Is it just me, or are some of his/the Board's (interchangeable, of course) shenanigans in reporting seem especially egregious for a publicly traded company?
Still, a good result for CF. Nice job.
It's just you...
No, it's not. Fortunately, little details like a decrease in profit are found in analyst stories elsewhere on the Web.
Jeff, could you provide a link to those other stories? Other than the increase in operating expenses and quote below, I don't understand how such after such a seemingly strong quarter profits went down.
"Net income for this same period totaled $31.6 million, or $0.57 per diluted limited partner unit, compared with net income of $61.7 million, or $1.10 per diluted limited partner unit, for the nine months ended September 27, 2009"
Well, you quoted the right numbers, but look here:
No, it's not. Fortunately, little details like a decrease in profit are found in analyst stories elsewhere on the Web.
This is a little misleading. The 3rd quarter actually saw increased revenue, increased attendance, and increased net income.
If we're measuring performance of the parks, and not of the details surrounding interest rate swaps on debt restructuring, then the parks are improved by about $3.5 million (backing out the one time accounting loss for the interest rate swaps).
The correct numbers (when comparing apples to apples in 2010 vs. 2009 Q3) would be:
$111.00 million Net Income ($75.7 million + $35.3 million one time accounting loss)
$107.6 million Net Income
Not to discount the total suck that is their mishandling of the long term debt, but if we're comparing year-over-year park performance, then the parks are showing signs of recovery.
But you really can't look at it in a vacuum. If the quarter included higher revenue but lower net income, that's not a step in the right direction. I do understand that there are unique "accounting events" from time to time, but in the last few years it seems like they've always got one queued up. Having to write that check for that asinine sale attempt is a pretty vivid example of trying to execute a really bad idea.
And interestingly enough, in reference to the Six Flags news today, I find it interesting that per cap continues to slide. I wonder if they're discounting too heavily for the purpose of growing attendance. I liked the Six Flags quote, that it's kind of like crack, and hard to back off of.
Yes and No.
The OPERATIONS aspect of the company are improving--that is evidenced by the numbers Coster Krazy & airbuzz quote. So the people running the parks are doing something right.
The problem is the FINANCING of the parent company. Someone at CF has to be ruing the fact that the PP purchase was financed with short term debt that had to be refinanced just after a credit crunch. It would have been much better if they had secured long term financing at the time of the purchase.
If CF sold units and paid off its debt only the operating numbers would matter. But that is not the case. Based on these numbers, the parks are improving while past bad decisions of the parent company are catching up to them. Hence, Q's wanting current company (as opposed to park) management out.
You must be logged in to post