Hey
This summer I had my 3rd visit to the point and had a great time. I rode Power Tower and loved both rides but preferred the Turbo Drop. Space Shot had a great smooth and comfy launch up 240 feet. Turbo Drop really lost my stomach and was great.
A few weeks later at the end of August I visited MFI near Niagara Falls. They just installed a Chance Slingshot named the Daredevil. I'm not sure how this thing is launched but its a sudden jerk up to the top. It really hurt my back and I was in pain the next day. The way back down was nice but the launch was quite painful. Figure this:
Power Tower = 2.5 X the size of Daredevil
Power Tower = smooth launch
Dare Devil = painful launch
Is it just me or does something not fit?
Any one know how chance towers are launched? The air launch seems much better.
Also, I've only launched coaster I've been on is Hulk and since its a Beemer its obviously smooth but how are launched on other coasters? Is it a sudden jerk of pain like on Daredevil? Or a nice smooth and FAST acceleration like on Power Tower.
Thanks!
-----------------
As the coasters get bigger so do the queue lines
-----------------
Schwarzkopf shuttle loops...The most possible fun in 36 seconds.
*** This post was edited by Intamin Fan on 11/12/2002. ***
Hulk Launch = Tires
LIM/ LSM = Equals magnetics
S&S Towers and other launched rides = Air Launch
Chance Towers = Dunno but I'd guess spring, because the S&S prototype used the worlds largest spring.
-----------------
I need to use the Pipi station.
I found the Fabbri chain lift freefall ride a little interesting, but I doubt that any models use a spring.
TRANSLATION: The only intense and kind of jerky launch I have ridden is Hypersonic, because it is so strong and sudden. However, Premier launches I have ridden aren't launched to its set speed of 1.8 seconds, but around 4-6secs. I thought the launch on the Premier spaghetti bowls were very weak when compared to B&R: The Chiller, which is not as fast as Hypersonic, but fast enough. I still liked Hypersonic though, I think it was just the seats weren't to comfortable. END TRANSLATION.
-----------------
Was anybody "really" able to keep your hands down on H:XLC....Lord knows I wanted to try and keep my arms down, and I "sorta" did....I thought it was more of a sudden "burst" of speed...well, it IS a "blast" of air, so that makes sense. Xcelerator seemed "smoother"...it was FAST, but seemedto be more "controlled". Not being able to keep my glasses on detracted somewhat....I like being launched indoors into the dark, definitely makes it FEEL faster to me...
bill, hoping nobody would realy want to build a ride with a launch that would literally "break my back"....that wouldn't be funny, nah, I think EVEN *I* would walk by THAT particualr ride, yes sirree bob...;)
-----------------
The below statement is true.
The above statement is false.
I agree with Gator, Xcelerator's launch is definately the bomb, intense power, but smooth as can be.
I can't wait to see if CP can copy that same type of intensity in 2003.
BGT one more month here I come !!
-----------------
"The Moose says your closed, I say your open"! Chevy Chase-Vacation
*** This post was edited by Donny S on 11/15/2002. ***
*** This post was edited by Donny S on 11/15/2002. ***
You must be logged in to post