I found this and it sounds kind of interesting. Must be some kind of model. But each six flags looks to be ordering one. At a reasonable price of $2.6 million. It would run like a real coaster, just slightly smaller. Quote from site. "Tuesday, February 08, 2005
B&M Introduces Inverted Mini
Following the tremendously positive reaction to Apple's announcement of the new Mac mini low-price computer, famed coaster designers Bollinger & Mabillard announced today a new "Inverted mini" coaster.
"With this, patrons can live the inverted lifestyle in stylish simplicity!" enthused company spokesman Melinda McCloud. "The new Inverted mini stands nearly three feet tall and yet performs as a complete full-course coaster!"
When reporters pointed out to McCloud that the ride appeared to be a hastily-repainted model coaster from Coaster Dynamix, McCloud scoffed and ended the press conference, declaring the Inverted mini to be "everything you wanted, and nothing you don't need. Unless you are over five inches tall. Then you might want to buy a full-scale version."
Six Flags has reportedly ordered one for each of its parks, paying what it deemed to be a "bargain" at $2.3 million per installation." I couldn't get the link to work so I just copied. Note: I did not just type this this is an actuall story. *** Edited 2/14/2005 1:45:47 AM UTC by Corkscrewy***
Here is the link. Not sure if it will work but I have the story above and the link is to prove i'm not making this up :) *** Edited 2/14/2005 1:51:25 AM UTC by Corkscrewy***
How about "Crap," "Schmutz," "Waste of Space," or maybe "I red iTT 0N thE InT3RnEtss!!!1111 S0 iT |\/|u$t b tRu!!!!111"
I guess I just got excited. *** Edited 2/14/2005 1:57:22 AM UTC by Corkscrewy***
Hell, there's probably people that think The Onion is real...
Of course, what's worse is that things are so bad for SFI that people can actually believe that they'd put one of them in every park.
This just proves to me again that everyone should have to pass some sort of a common sense test before being allowed to use the internets.
And maybe a spelling test, too? ;)
I think ARN&R needs to put in their TOS "I agree to comprehend sarcasm and satire before spreading nonsense rumors throughout the internet"...;)
Reader's Digest ran a letter to the editor several years ago, citing all the kids who had turned to worshipping Satan after reading Harry Potter books. She didn't say she got her facts from the Onion, but she quoted directly from it. RD later ran a story about the mistake.
A Chinese newspaper picked up an Onion story a couple of years ago, about members of Congress demanding better buildings or they'd go on strike (a parody of demanding baseball players). The newspaper never ran a retraction.
I've read several other cases of Onion stories being taken seriously. People are gullible. Just the other day, I got an e-mail from a close relative who insisted that I'd earn up to $20,000 from Bill Gates himself if I would just forward the e-mail to everyone I knew.
You must be logged in to post