He did say this theme park would be many years off if it were to come to fuition at all. Right now, they are just bouncing around many different ideas on how to build upon the incredible aviation history in Dayton.
He said this wouldn't be a park with roller coasters, but more of an interactive, hands on type park. He did mention the possibilty of a few airplane type rides, and noting that the first parachute was developed in Dayton, we both thought of a parachute drop ride.
They also thought of an aviation camp, similar to the space camp in Huntsville, AL.
If this park were to develope, they would also like ideas on a huge aviation related icon that can be seen from miles away. Something that would become a symbol for the city like the St. Louis arch is.
Sounds like a great idea to me.
At the end of the article they want to show us "their" plan for this. Ok, instead of this stupid thing, how about upgrade the schools, put new comptuers in, attract sporting events like FIRST Robotics and other competitions to the area, focus on turning around downtown Dayton, clean up the place, make DAYTON LOOK NICE!
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
Most of the proposed sites their talking about for the future, are either already standing or will require very little land to construct. The theme park would by far be the crowning achievement, the article evens states it.
The Riverscape fountains (mentioned above) have pretty much been a joke from day one. They're neat...when they work! The laser shows they use the fountains for are neat too...when they work! But they have done a lot to improve the look of downtown I have to admit. That area has made downtown very welcoming IMO.
Haha... "ungineers".... I think Jeff just coined a new word.
Also, the traffic on I-75 is nothing to sneeze at. In this part of the state, it's a much busier interstate than I-71. Starting just north of Troy, stretching all the way down to Richwood, Kentucky, I-75 is at the very minimum of 3 lanes in each direction, and of course wider as you get into Dayton and then Cincinnati. Having lived in Sidney, Ohio and traveled south along the interstate into West Chester on a regular basis, I assure you the traffic is far from light. It is quite busy throughout the majority of the day, and in fact the heaviest traveled part of the entire length of I-75 is through the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky area.
Jeff - Editor - CoasterBuzz.com - My Blog
Gatlinburg, Branson and other areas rely on a mix of attractions, as well as natural environment, to draw in tourists. People coming to Ohio aren't going to oooh and ahhhh at the gently rolling hills and river valleys in this part of the state.
Unless this proposed theme park were actually on the scale of Universal or Disney - and open year round (unlikely with the cold and snow around here) - I can't see that many people flocking to one particular area in Ohio. If CP and PKI can't draw that many people, with the rest of the attractions around each park, then I highly doubt the projected attendance figures accompanying this proposal for the Dayton area. *** Edited 3/31/2006 4:06:55 PM UTC by oneup***
It's kind of like what's going on over on the PA Turnpike near Harrisburg. They're building a completely new bridge over the Susquehanna River by moving the pike over a little. Here's a link for any who really care:
You have disturbed the forbidden temple, now-you-will-pay!!!
Driving I-75 would probably still always be better then.. I could just take I-70, to I-75, to I-275 to I-74, which helps me avoid the mess I-71 is going to be... I just have to make sure I'm not driving I-75 at the wrong time, or I'd be getting nowhere!
You must be logged in to post