Monday, November 7, 2005 10:43 AM
Good! SFFT deserves a *better* invert than an SLC... :)
Who DOESN'T have a *jones* to ride an Anton?!!? ;)
If Greezed Lightnin' doesn't find a home elsewhere, might I suggest Cypress? The park has NO coaster inversions at present, and Starliner won't be ready until '07...
Monday, November 7, 2005 12:51 PM
rollergator said: Good! SFFT deserves a *better* invert than an SLC...
...so does TGE. ;)
BATWING FAN SFA
Monday, November 7, 2005 12:55 PM
I think it's a safe bet to say that none of the coasters will be going to any flagged SF property.
Monday, November 7, 2005 4:56 PM
Where did that brilliant leap in logic come from?
Monday, November 7, 2005 5:26 PM
On another subject. I sure hope the rumors of UT heading for the scrap heap aren't true!!!
Real Cbuzz quote of the day -
"The classes i take in collage are so mor adcanced then u could imagen. Dont talk about my emglihs" - Adamforce
Tuesday, November 8, 2005 3:20 PM
Sadly, that's one rumor with a high probability of being true. Enthusiasts like the ride because its rather unique, but it doesn't appear so far that any park actually wanted to buy it. Low capacity and high maintenance costs aren't real appealing on a used 20 year old ride.