I went there once and had two incidents...
1) On one of the bob-sled runs I was going down the hill and another sled hit mine from behind. It scared the bejezus out of me because I was trying to maintain a safe distance from the dude in front of me and I never heard it coming.
2) On a standard water slide (nothing too extreme) I was hit by another slider as I was making my way to the surface of the spalsh pool.
I would have to say it was over 20 years ago, but the memory of danger of that place lingers on.
Here's To Shorter Lines & Longer Trip Reports!
Who said I didn't like you? I was just trying to point out the ********** in your *********** above.
manofthechurch said:
^ I am not sure what that means?
Why don't you like me?
Becaue you're an even bigger idiot than I am.
I remember the Traction Park jokes... too bad for the victims it wasn't that much of a joke.
It still looks kind of insane to me.
especially: Why doesn't the water accumulate at thee bottom of the loop?
*** Edited 1/17/2008 4:07:27 AM UTC by superman***
Newspapers report that it is currently tested by TÜV (technical surveillance authority). The two test riders and several dummies found out that the g-forces go up to 6g. The manufacturer will now increase the looping diameter to reach a peak level of 5g.
Before you use the slide, you will have to pass a turnstile with an inbuilt scale. Only people between 35 kg and 100 kg will be allowed to ride. This will rule out some children, models and most americans (sorry, could not resist ;))
Hearing the stories about high g-forces and doctoring with the loop size and form makes me wonder if this new attempt will have a longer life than its predecessor.
*** Edited 1/17/2008 10:02:02 AM UTC by tricktrack***
There will need to be lots of pumps and water will have to be *made* to move in ways it wouldn't ordinarily move under its own power... :)
edit: With a minimum of 35kg, maybe this will give Kate Moss incentive to eat something? ;)
*** Edited 1/17/2008 4:14:56 PM UTC by rollergator***
Not sure I agree with you.
Sounds and looks kind of violent though, I am not sure I would want my ears and body exposed to a stream of water like that.
(Someone posted this in the German forum in the topic with the prototype - just to cite my sources here).
*** Edited 1/17/2008 5:05:21 PM UTC by superman***
Ever been to epcot?(:
what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard.
Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it.
I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
that is to say not as tight as a loop, not as "loose" as a corkskrew...
its hard to explain but if you look at the picture you can better understand what I'm trying to say...
the picture is in this link: http://freizeitparkweb.de/cgi-bin/dcf/dcboard.cgi?az=show_thread&om=346&forum=DCForumID74
perhaps this way, since the water doesn't go straight up and over, but up, to the side, then over, the slide is possible.
ugh it made sense to me lol.
If It Ain't Broke, It Must Be Fixed
Does the rider actually go upside down? It appears as if the rider might not.
(muahahahaha)
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
PU-wheels on steel are just so much easier to predict.
You must be logged in to post