Posted
Amusement Business posted their annual survey of attendance estimates for the top 50 parks in North America for 2003. The big winner was Disney's California Adventure, showing a 13% increase, while Epcot, SeaWorld Florida, Cedar Point and Paramount's Kings Island all showed significant gains. Six Flags saw a decrease across the board, significant losses in certain markets.
Get the report from Amusement Business (requires Adobe Acrobat Reader).
Orlando's tourist industry optimistic about the coming year. Read more from The Orlando Sentinel.
The Motley Fool thinks that the amusement industry as a whole is ripe for a successful year. Read more from The Motley Fool.
mOOSH
I was shocked to see that SFA made the list, but wasn't shocked at the 8% drop. Besides the awful weather that started the season, I don't think Penguin's Blizzard River was enough of a draw, as well as many rides that were having maintenance problems (some continuous like Batwing and Iron Eagle). Then you add in the infamous Two-Face stall, the power outage on a busy Saturday, and you have some unhappy customers. It'll be interesting to see the fall-out from the S:ROS incident on a very busy second to last day of Fright Fest.
And really, most of these parks either lived or died by one thing...marketing. How else to explain how Sea World Texas can be up (and saying "great weather") while SFFT is down (citing "hot weather"). I don't think Sea World had much to offer in new attractions this year, and I know from experience that it can be like the Sahara desert there in the summer. So it can't be weather related either...especially since they are in the same city!!!
It's just like playing RCT. If you spend the money and advertise, people will come, and if you don't, you will have flat attendance at best. Having a new ride helps, but as these results show, is no guarantee of success. Likewise, not having a new ride doesn't mean your attendance will go down either if you market agressively.
Certinaly the weather and the blackout played parts in the decreases, but those type of things are too easy to point to as excuses sometimes when in fact it was other factors that were the real cause.
Personally, I can't wait to see DCA this winter. Based on how everyone bashes the place, my expectations are sure to be exceeded!
-DHo
*Razorback - the OTHER white meat - Go MIZZOU!*
Guest, or customer, as Dave was noting....it's a crucial difference in perspective...and *eventually*, the bottom line will always end up reflecting the way the company treats the people coming in the gates...and, ultimately, their employees as well....
Belglan, glad to hear that the Euro parks aren't going down with the Americana ship.
-DHo
*Razorback - the OTHER white meat - Go MIZZOU!*
That being said, I would expect virtually all of the L.A. area parks next year to post increases (expect perhaps SFMM) as they will all have new attractions. Even Sea World! First time that's happened in awhile. I'm sure DCA will draw higher numbers as the float in the Rose Parade will be a HUGE advertisement for ToT and the park in general. I am sure that will generate visits all year long.
We just got back from Splash Lagoon up in Erie , and had a GREAT TIME! I'll be coming back up there soon again, probably winter of 2004/05! Only dislike I had was the chlorine residue vapors in the air, which the air is filtered 6 times an hour isn't enough, but would also lower the air temperature, so I can live with it. And that Mean Gene's Pizza was better than Pizza Hut & Dominos! Kudos to ERIE, PA :)
You must be logged in to post