BATWING FAN SFA said:
(SFI) would just decide to give them to some more parks.....or have they already given them to the parks they deem "worthy" yet?
You know, your ability to weave a piss and moan session about SFA being deprived into almost any conversation on any topic (even though everyone has already disproven your theory time and again and is tired of hearing it) at any time almost seems worthy of praise. International Piss and Moan Club Dictator-for-Life or something. You could have all the SFDL people as your underlings.
I only have 4 major parks close by ... WAAAA
I live in a state with no parks ... WAAAA
My park hasn't gotten a world record breaker, and of course no other installations count for anything unless they're the biggest and the best in the world ... WAAAA
(it was a Calvin and Hobbes reference tho ;) GROSS club and all ... this post brought to you in part by Artie Lang)
LONNOL said:"Know of any I don't?"Well, yes.
Adam
It is amazing how people that don't work for these companies have such insight on thier pending contracts. ;)
Adam *** Edited 11/24/2004 11:23:19 PM UTC by LONNOL***
Joe ;)
tricktrack said:
I really like the "lie down" boarding and can only imagine the loading times and lawsuits this design would generate.
I think B&M's are superior more because of the restraint system than because of the tilting mechanism. I bet you'd still get easy loading if you did the Vekoma style tilting with the B&M style restraints (please!).
Hobbes: "What's the point of attaching a number to everything you do?"
Calvin: "If your numbers go up, it means you're having more fun."
You have to sit there waiting for the ops to come around & check each one & given the nature of the employees that SF has on their payroll....well I'm sure you all get the picture.
SAM
When I start taking over smaller parks and build up to larger parks, you can bet I'll have at least one 4D, maybe even in WV;)...
Gomex, I would beg to differ...How do you know they don't have new inovations aviable. B&M are a powerhouse company in ideas, they take a proven idea and impove upon it. The 4-D coaster has yet to be a proven idea, do to the troubles with X.
Due to the troubles with X? Yes, X had its kinks the opening 2 years, but asDWeaver said, through 2004 I think we've all seen that even a "decent" park can get one up and running well. Has yet to be a proven idea? What do you call X then? I don't know how you could get more proven than installing one for the public to ride on a consistent day to day basis.
I'm all for 4-d coasters, the possibilities are almost endless, the thrill is unmatched. The amount of "awe" on these coasters can't compare to any record breaking height or speed coaster. Maybe I'm the only one to think this way, but I guess you just have to ride it to know...
But I totally agree with your second paragraph ZZM, X is incredible!
You must be logged in to post