Search :  
Close
CoasterBuzz Forums > News Discussion >

Low Playland attendance sparks debate about funding the park

You must register and login to post.
Previous < Topic > Next
Posted October 12, 2009, 5:20P | Contributed by Jeff

County owned park has weak attendance this year, sparking a debate about its future. Some believe the county should not be in the business of operating the park, even though it does not currently require tax money to operate.

Read more from The Journal News.

Related parks:

Playland Park

Digg this! Digg
October 13, 2009, 9:01A

Re: Low Playland attendance sparks debate about funding the park

To me it's pretty simple.......having been there often in the past but refusing to go now.......it used to be a small parking fee and pay as you ride, so going to the park and spending a small amount of money was feasible but now with Pay One Price people are not going. There is not enough there to susatin a P.O.P.

It's a simple solution in my eyes.....go back to the old way......and invest in another medium sized coaster.

October 13, 2009, 5:58P

Re: Low Playland attendance sparks debate about funding the park

I too prefer the old system, but you can still get in as a non-rider for a few bucks. It is really annoying though, because they now have gates up everywhere, and you have to scan your wristband when you leave and enter.

October 13, 2009, 6:27P

Re: Low Playland attendance sparks debate about funding the park

Yep, changing to POP is why I won't go anymore. The only way they're getting me back otherwise is if I get to ride the wooden kiddie coaster.


AV Matt
Long live the Big Bad Wolf

October 14, 2009, 2:02P

Re: Low Playland attendance sparks debate about funding the park

^Matt, it is my *understanding* that all future enthusiast events are LIKELY to contain some ride time on the kiddie coaster. It is my intention to schedule a flight for the first event at the park in '10 to verify that this is indeed the case. The only wooden coaster I've encountered that I couldn't ride due to being...an "adult".

October 14, 2009, 4:18P

Re: Low Playland attendance sparks debate about funding the park

There was already an event this year that had ert on it.


4 Countries, 28 States, 144 Parks, 599 Coasters, 69,172 Miles
http://www.rollercoasterfreak.com My YouTube

October 14, 2009, 4:45P

Re: Low Playland attendance sparks debate about funding the park

^Yes, but the flyer only mentioned Dragon Coaster ERT, and by the time I heard that the Kiddie Coaster would *possibly* be included, plans were already set in stone for travel elsewhere. As God is my witness, I will get a lap on that thing...sometime. LOL!


http://www.schlittercon.com/vid1cr.htm

October 14, 2009, 5:34P

Re: Low Playland attendance sparks debate about funding the park

Rumor has it, Gator kidnaps kids, Walks on kids shoulders and bribes grandmas to ride kiddie coasters

As for Playland. I loved the park. Totally found it to be *Without the Flying coaster* to be the best traditional out there. Knoebels has more to do but the classic feel goes to Playland.
Chuck

October 14, 2009, 6:00P

Re: Low Playland attendance sparks debate about funding the park

rollergator said: The only wooden coaster I've encountered that I couldn't ride due to being...an "adult".

If only you hadn't flown Detla (dis)Connection that morning...


Betty White Loves Me!

October 16, 2009, 12:01A

Re: Low Playland attendance sparks debate about funding the park

They should also get rid of the height limit for the wild mouse coaster which I think is 6 feet. I don't think any of the Zamperla wild mouse coasters have that restriction (I know Morey's doesn't).

It barely seems like it is worth a stop for me if I was in the area just for the Dragon Coaster and the Zamperla flyer (which I have heard nothing but bad things about).

October 16, 2009, 1:07A

Re: Low Playland attendance sparks debate about funding the park

Are you saying that anyone under 6 feet tall (72 inches) is not permitted to ride the wild mouse there? That would eliminate half of the adults in my family right there.

I am pretty sure that you are mistaken, at least I hope so.


www.myspace.com/lostkauseband
"What kind of website is this again?"

October 16, 2009, 1:14A

Re: Low Playland attendance sparks debate about funding the park

I think he's saying the maximum height is 6 feet, LK.


coasterimage.com

October 16, 2009, 6:36P

Re: Low Playland attendance sparks debate about funding the park

Yeah, anyone over 6 feet can't ride

October 16, 2009, 6:57P

Re: Low Playland attendance sparks debate about funding the park

Well, that would eliminate the OTHER half of my family.


www.myspace.com/lostkauseband
"What kind of website is this again?"

October 20, 2009, 12:07A

Re: Low Playland attendance sparks debate about funding the park

I was denied entry to the Wild Mouse there (I am 6'3"). Apparently, it is just because of the low roof in the station....

As for the park... you can still get smaller ride packages (buy points for rides). As for me, when my friends and I went this year (our first trip), we went for POP and spent the day there... rode everything many times over. I enjoyed it.

Previous < Topic > Next
CoasterBuzz Forums > News Discussion > Low Playland attendance sparks debate about funding the park
Powered by POP Forums v8.5
©2010 POP World Media, LLC, All Rights Reserved
Legal, privacy and copyright | Contact Us