Re: Cedar Fair cited for OSHA violations
1) Dragster
I've seen them misusing the cable tray as described. The cable tray has labels on it that specifically state that it is not to be used as a catwalk. The problem is not that the cable tray cannot support the weight, the problem is that the cable tray is not equipped with a non-skid surface, a toe board, and a 42" railing. I'm not sure what OSHA expects them to do in this case, given that the ride does not have a catwalk, and while one could be installed, it would likely not be useful for inspection because it would have to be built over or outboard of the cable tray. I'm surprised there isn't also a citation there for "failure to provide continuous fall protection" as well, but I suppose they get away from that because there is no catwalk and therefore the workers should not be out there anyway. In fact, that's probably *why* they use the cable tray instead of a catwalk: because it isn't supposed to be used as a catwalk, it doesn't have to have railings, toe boards, and other industrial crap that would either detract from the ride or present a significant hazard to patrons.
2) Millennium Force
This one is *unbroadcastable*. The complaint says that employees are exposed to fall hazards of up to 300 feet, when in fact the only catwalks that exist on Millennium Force are between the boarding platform and the unloading platform, at the base of the lift, and along the final brake run and the storage track. All of those catwalks have railings except the one in the center of the track on the storage track and on the final brake run. There, it is impossible to install a railing, but the employees who perform "coaster button reset activities" do not use those catwalks. They only use the catwalks that have railings, along side the track.
3) Blue Streak
Where are they talking about? Railings extend all the way around that track, and it is possible to use personal fall protection equipment at any point around the course, although my guess is that someone was caught inspecting the ride without doing so.
This whole thing smells like an OSHA inspector spent a day at Cedar Point on vacation and saw a bunch of things he didn't like, so he went back to the office and started writing up fines...
I'm not saying that Cedar Point is blameless in all of this. I'm just saying that the allegations seem to have holes in them, and don't really seem to recognize (as is typical for OSHA) that the industrial situations on an amusement ride are unique and don't always work with the solutions that OSHA expects.
--Dave Althoff, Jr.