This policy change simply reaffirms what was already known when Cypress Gardens reopened that it cannot depend on Orlando visitors.
Because the big parks (specifically Disney) have them so wrapped up.
Cypress Gardens doesn't need Magic Kingdom numbers to be successful, so the Disney figures are impressive, but irrelevant.
Except that it gives an idea of how many people Cypress Gardens isn't attracting. Obviously they don't need Disney numbers, but I think the business idea was that with that many people in the general area, the overflow alone could sustain the park. Picking up 1-in-1000 of the visitors Disney gets isn't working.
The new owners of Cypress Gardens got the park for a bargain and there is no reason why they cannot turn a profit on this property by focusing on locals.
I tend to agree. Unless, of course, those 50 people a day were generally locals. 
Seriously, I understand Cypress Gardens is 35 miles away, but with all the people passing through Orlando, you'd think they could pull way more than 50 a day just by putting brochures or rack cards in all the hotels or tourist stops in Orlando.
I think the fact that it doesn't happen and the idea that locals need to support the park says a lot about how well the big parks (again, specifically Disney) retain their guests.