This is a simple supply and demand issue!
There are plenty of teachers willing to work for the pay offered. It is a degree that is relatively easy to obtain versus those degrees that lead to higher wages (MD, MBA, law, etc). This, along with an obvious friendly work environment (in terms of work hours and vacation days) leads to an ample supply of qualified teachers.
This is really a chicken and egg scenario. IF there was a REAL teacher shortage, then there would not be enough teachers to meet the needs and voters would act accordingly to assure increased salaries. As it is, there is no REAL shortage, so there is no incentive to affect change in salary structure. There are plenty of people, like myself, that are happy to work for less money because we perceive the overall compensation to be worth it.
Furthermore, in my opinion, a salary increase should/would be followed by a comparable increase in the quality of student, and probably the standard thresh hold, at the college level who enter into education. It is sad, that the college of education is usually one of the least stringent, if not THE LEAST STRINGENT of all colleges to get accepted into on any given campus. This alone shows the priority that society puts on an educator is not that high.
However, the fact remains that there are plenty of bodies to fill the job. The compensation is commiserate with the effort and education needed to enter the marketplace. Everybody wants and thinks they deserve more money. Only the market determines IF this is the case. Sadly, the current market easily indicates that teachers are paid fair.
P.S. Did I mention that I’m going to Orlando for 2-3 weeks this December to hit all the parks? I’m going on the taxpayer dollar and a teacher’s pay scale. I’m quite grateful that I have this time off around the Holidays to do this. My non-educator friends do not have such a luxury. Couple this with my 10 weeks off this summer, and my 15 sick days per year and it is hard for me to preach to people that I’m underpaid at $40,000-$50,000 per!
P.S.S. Utah has some of the lowest teacher pay scales and lowest per pupil expenditures of any state in the Union. Yet their test scores are at the top. New York has some of the highest per pupil expenditures on education in the Union yet their test scores remain in the bottom 1/3rd. How can money be identified as the real culprit? Maybe we should look at what they are doing in Utah and try to mimic their actions. This is just an opposing thought for those of you in the “throwing money at the problem will solve it” group!