Alright, can't say we didn't have enough evidence of this coming....three points: first, CF couldn't re-use a name from ANOTHER coaster....I mean, SF has been "recycling" for years, saves on all that costly brainstorming....second, guess whatever problems CP had with WT have been ironed out to CF satisfaction (or was VF "signed and sealed" before the problems with WT)...third, is it just me, or would it be better if the twisted spike (assuming only one twisted) were in the back....based on WT, S:UE,V2....I'd prefer to twist backwards (probably just an enthusiast preference, I can see where the GP prefers the "softer" version, LOL)....
*** This post was edited by rollergator on 9/3/2002. ***